Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Douglas Alexander: Fall of government would be tragic for Afghanistan and a threat to the world

A plainclothes security officer escorts students rescued from nearby school during a Taliban attack in Peshawar, Pakistan.
A plainclothes security officer escorts students rescued from nearby school during a Taliban attack in Peshawar, Pakistan.

As Americans prepared to celebrate their July 4 holiday last week, US troops packed up, and quietly vacated Bagram, their biggest base in Afghanistan.

And, in a symbol of how power is shifting in the country, as soon as the lights went off, the looters went in.

With characteristic British understatement, General Sir Nick Carter, Chief of the Defence Staff, described the Americans’ departure as “not a decision we hoped for”.

That exit, 20 years after the al Qaida attacks on America that triggered the operation, will be welcomed by most Americans.

The cost of the long engagement has been painfully high. In the UK we honour the more than 450 British personnel that gave their lives as part of the Nato operation.

More than 2,300 US servicemen and women were killed, while the cost for US taxpayers is close to $1 trillion.

These immense human and financial costs demand we try and answer two searching questions – has the effort been worth the sacrifice? And could there have been a better response now than what former US Ambassador Ryan Crocker described as “we decided we were tired, and we were going home”?

The Nato mission to Afghanistan began because al Qaida had been welcomed into the country and from there launched attacks, first in East Africa, and then on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.

The mission aimed to prevent al Qaida operating from Afghanistan with impunity, and since 9/11, there has been not a single successful international attack planned from Afghanistan.

Yet the mission also involved trying to make Afghanistan more stable and secure so Nato forces could step back as Afghan forces stepped up.

While serving as the UK’s International Development Secretary, I oversaw our contribution to that effort.

Gains were made. In Afghanistan in 2001, just one million children across Afghanistan had access to education – all of them boys. A decade later more than six million children, a third of them girls, were in school.

Yet, as the now Afghan President, Ashraf Ghani, told me in a conversation in Kabul at the time, “Afghanistan faces four simultaneous crises – poverty, corruption, narcotics and insurgency – each of them would challenge a government far stronger than ours”.

Those crises take many more than two decades to resolve and help explain the continued conflict as the US leaves the country.

Could that departure have been done differently? I believe so, and in that belief I’m reflecting the past thinking of none other than Joe Biden.

When he was Barack Obama’s Vice President, he argued not for an “endless war” but a counter-terrorism approach combining Special Forces and Air Power.

Already US intelligence estimates suggest the Afghan Government could fall to the Taliban as soon as six months to two years after US troops are gone.

That would be a tragedy not just for Afghanistan, but a real risk for the rest of the world.


Douglas Alexander is former Secretary of State for International Development.