Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

A Scots public inquiry into pandemic? Absolutely yes, possibly no, definitely maybe: Government urged to confirm a date after another day of confusion

© Jane Barlow / PAA scientist prepares a sample for Covid-19 testing at Glasgow Lighthouse facility
A scientist prepares a sample for Covid-19 testing at Glasgow Lighthouse facility

Ministers were urged to confirm a Scottish public inquiry into the pandemic yesterday as critics said the current confusion cannot continue.

When – or if – a Scottish inquiry will be held remains unclear after Health Secretary Humza Yousaf, speaking during a radio interview yesterday morning, pledged an investigation only for the Scottish Government to backtrack later in the day.

Calls for an inquiry are escalating and today we can reveal deepening concern about the protection given to frontline workers as health and safety watchdogs are accused of investigating only a fraction of the deaths caused by Covid in the workplace.

Political opponents described the situation as a shambles while campaigners speaking on behalf of families of care home residents lost to Covid said the first minister must end the confusion.

While the SNP in its Scottish Parliament election manifesto pledged an inquiry into how Scotland responded to the pandemic, Nicola Sturgeon has now said she wants to wait to see the remit of a four-nation investigation announced by Boris Johnson but not expected to start until next spring.

Humza Yousaf

Yousaf told BBC Radio 4 yesterday a Scottish inquiry would go ahead and that he was in charge of appointing its chair and deciding its remit.

He said: “What we will do is have a full and frank public inquiry. I’m tasked, actually, to lead that as health secretary, in terms of getting the remit set up and making sure there is an appropriate chair and so on and so forth.

“I’m going to do that cross-party and one of the issues, undoubtedly, that the inquiry will look at, again with an independent chair, fully, freely and frankly, will be discharges into care homes.”

However, that was contradicted later when a Scottish Government spokesman said the first minister would wait until she saw the terms of reference of the UK inquiry before deciding if Scotland needed one despite mounting calls from charities, experts and bereaved families.

Yesterday, Alan Wightman, of Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice, who speaks for relatives of some of the 3,000 residents who died in Scots care homes, including his mum Helen, said: “This is all very confusing. We would be very unhappy if Scottish Government ministers are going to wait for the UK inquiry. Health and social care are devolved matters and have been for years.

“It has nothing to do with Westminster. Scottish Government ministers decided what they wanted to do in Scotland, including moving Covid-positive and untested patients from hospitals to care homes.

“Those decisions were made in Scotland by Scots so there must be an inquiry in Scotland on these devolved matters, as well as a UK inquiry on reserved matters such as borders policy.”

The Scottish Parliament voted last year for an immediate judge-led inquiry but six months on the relatives of more than 10,000 people who died of the virus are still waiting.

The Scottish Conservatives said Yousaf’s intervention had only deepened confusion. Shadow Health Secretary Annie Wells said: “This is a shambles. The public are expecting a full, judge-led inquiry into Scotland’s Covid-19 response, immediately. And that’s what they should have.

“Anything less than a gold-standard process would fail those who died in care homes and hospitals, their families, and many more. Any announcements should have been in the Scottish Parliament, with full scrutiny, not on the radio on a Saturday morning.”

The SNP’s manifesto gave a commitment to launching a probe. However, two weeks ago First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said she wanted to wait for details of a UK-wide inquiry which will not begin until 2022.

Parliament backed a motion for an immediate public inquiry tabled by the Scottish Conservatives after The Sunday Post revealed that dozens of hospital patients with Covid were moved to care homes.

One in 10 residents – 3,317 people – lost their lives to the virus. In March, before the election, Sturgeon committed to establishing a judge-led inquiry which she said would get under way by the end of this year.

She said: “This will happen in Scotland whether or not it happens in other parts of the UK.”

Meanwhile, the Scottish Liberal Democrats have written to Sturgeon to ask her to commit to a timetable for an inquiry.

The party’s leader, Willie Rennie MSP, said: “While the vaccine programme now appears to offer us a route back to normality, we don’t know how long we will be living with the remnants of this virus. We must prepare for others.”

The Scottish Government said: “Following the UK Government’s decision to follow us in committing to take forward a four nations full public inquiry, detailed work will be done on the terms of reference and the timescale.

“When we have a greater sense of that remit, we will make a judgment as to whether the UK-wide inquiry covers all of the issues that need to be covered for Scotland or whether there is a need to have a part of the process that looks at other issues.

“We are also clear that we expect it to begin its work by the end of this year. If the UK Government does not take this forward swiftly, we will determine if a distinct Scottish inquiry is required to meet the needs of families who have been impacted.”

Last week, we reported mounting calls for a public inquiry in Scotland to investigate the protection given to frontline workers as private firms and public authorities are accused of failing to care for their safety.

We can reveal today just five work-related Covid-19 deaths are being investigated by health and safety watchdogs. The Health & Safety Executive (HSE) says 21 cases have been officially reported to the agency but just five of those are being actioned. Experts are demanding an inquiry amid claims the true work-related death figure is more than 1,000, and we can reveal HSE inspectors visited just 10 workplaces, fewer than half the sites where a report was lodged.

Dave Moxam, deputy general secretary of the Scottish Trades Union Congress, said: “It’s simply not credible that just five work-related deaths are worthy of investigation when there are well over 1,000 Covid-19 deaths among those of working age. Are we really being expected to believe just 21 deaths were reportable?

“We know unions have been dealing with thousands of complaints concerning lack of PPE and people being compelled to attend work when they should have been working from home or on sick leave.

“The non-reporting of health and safety breaches is nothing short of disgraceful and urgent questions must be asked of the hundreds of employers who ignored their legal responsibilities. Swift action must be taken against the most culpable.”

Just two employers have been issued with written warnings from HSE, and none are being prosecuted.

Gary Smith, of the GMB union said: “We need an urgent public inquiry in Scotland. People who cheered frontline workers from their doorsteps during the pandemic would be deeply shocked to learn what went on and how some employers, including the NHS, were treating staff.”

The family of nursing assistant Neil Alexander, 64, who died on St Valentine’s Day after the deadly virus swept through the Woodland View psychiatric unit in Irvine where he worked, leaving a patient dead and 20 people infected, said they were “horrified” his death was not on the list.

His partner Barbara Anne Rae, 59, from Minishant, Ayrshire, who has now written to NHS Ayrshire & Arran chief executive John Burns demanding to know why Neil’s death had still not been reported to the HSE or the Crown Office & Procurator Fiscal Service, said: “We believe these figures in no way represent the true numbers who’ve died avoidable deaths due to Covid-19 infection at work.”

Lawyer Bruce Shields, of Thompsons Solicitors, said Neil’s case would be the first of the NHS being sued over the death of an employee from Covid-19. The HSE has confirmed that it has not been officially notified of Neil’s death.

Safety campaigner Rab Wilson, of A Safe & Accountable People’s NHS, said: “Thousands of deaths of patients and workers are concealed because they are not being officially reported and nobody is calling the regulators to account. It’s shameful.”

Ian Tasker, of worker safety campaign Scottish Hazards, said: “The so-called official figures simply don’t add up to the reality of lives lost and workers being placed at risk.”

NHS Ayrshire & Arran said it could not comment due to staff confidentiality, but said: “We review every positive staff case to identify if there is a requirement to report to the Health and Safety Executive.”