Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Documents detailing history of Scotland’s nuclear industry suddenly removed from public archives

The bottom half of the Dounreay reactor, a steel ball 135-ft wide, during construction in July 1956 (Charles Hewitt/Picture Post/Getty Images)
The bottom half of the Dounreay reactor, a steel ball 135-ft wide, during construction in July 1956 (Charles Hewitt/Picture Post/Getty Images)

HUNDREDS of files revealing the history of Scotland’s nuclear industry – including details of accidents and safety reviews – are among documents suddenly withdrawn from public view.

Documents that were previously public at the National Archives in Kew are being withheld after a “security review” was ordered last month.

The papers covered a range of topics on Britain’s nuclear weapons and atomic energy programmes, including reports of nuclear weapons testing carried out in Australia during the 1950s and 1960s.

They include hundreds of archive papers relating to nuclear power plants Dounreay in Caithness and Chapelcross in Dumfries and Galloway, and the Hunterston A and Hunterston B power stations in Ayrshire.

Researchers said they had been left in the dark over the reasons why the files had been withdrawn.

The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), which has responsibility for the files, has said a security review is being carried out in conjunction with defence officials to look at whether it is “appropriate” the documents remain publicly accessible. However, no timescale has been given for when this will be complete.

The NDA has also only said it is likely the “vast majority” of files will be opened up again.

Jon Agar, professor of science and technology studies at University College London, said: “Just before Christmas all the files were withdrawn from the National Archive without any explanation or communication.

“It was replaced with a message that if you need to see this, you have to put in an FOI request.”

The files on the Scottish sites date from the 1950s to the 1990s and include papers on accidents and safety reviews. It includes papers on Dounreay, once the UK’s centre for fast reactor research, which is now in the process of being decommissioned.

Other files relate to Chapelcross, a nuclear power plant in Dumfries and Galloway, which was designed to produce weapons-grade plutonium for Britain’s nuclear missiles. It was decommissioned in 2004.

Dozens of archive files on Hunterston A power station in Ayrshire, which closed in 1990, and on Hunterston B, which is due to operate until 2023, have also been withdrawn from public view.

Professor Agar added: “Almost everything we would want to know on the public record which allows us to trace the history of nuclear establishments across the country have been essentially withdrawn from public sight.”

Professor Agar said the files often contained technical information, and were examined “rigorously” before being put in the public domain.

He added: “It may be they have lost confidence in their review process.

“Or it could be a specific concern – someone has pointed out something that shouldn’t be there, and they have thought it might be in other files.”

Ian Chamberlain, of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, said the withdrawal of the archive papers was “very concerning”.

He said: “It seems that even if this archive is made public again parts of it will continue to be withheld, but a crucial part of the democratic process is to learn from past mistakes.”

The National Archives referred enquiries to the NDA, but said: “We have been asked to temporarily withdraw these records which is why they now appear on our catalogue as ‘access under review’.”

The NDA said: “The NDA, Ministry of Defence and the Atomic Weapons Establishment are jointly undertaking a security review to ensure that it is appropriate for the records to remain in the public domain.

“Once complete, it is anticipated public access will be restored to the vast majority of the documents. When able, the NDA will provide further updates about the progress of the review.”