Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Rona Dougall: We need more from leaders than a gung-ho spirit and delusions of adequacy self-belief

© ISABEL INFANTES/EPA-EFE/ShutterstockLiz Truss addresses members at the Tory conference earlier this month in Birmingham
Liz Truss addresses members at the Tory conference earlier this month in Birmingham

These days my Twitter feed seems to be almost entirely dominated by pictures and memes of dogs being impossibly cute, cats climbing into boxes and even a puppy being mothered by a hen. Adorable.

I’m no tech expert but I think there must be an algorithm that senses I find the current political situation too much and I just need soothing images of animals.

A stand-out post this week was of a tiny sausage dog carrying a stick about five times its size, knocking over a random human as it went on its merry way. Was the dog being far too ambitious or just delusional?

Turns out there’s a name for this. The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias where incompetent people wildly overestimate their ability. In other words, these idiots think they are gallus. And they are not. The effect was named after US social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999.

“In many cases, incompetence does not leave people disoriented, perplexed or cautious,” Dunning has written. “Instead, the incompetent are often blessed with an inappropriate confidence, buoyed by something that feels to them like knowledge.”

Interestingly, they found that women were less prone in general to this self-delusion than men. But there’s always an exception.

I first heard about the Dunning-Kruger effect when someone was describing the 44-day tenure of Liz Truss, the UK’s shortest-serving prime minister. Why, one political commentator wondered, had she even stood in the first place when she was clearly not up to the job?

To take on the biggest role in politics requires a mind-boggling degree of self-belief, an almost staggering arrogance that you above all others deserve the gig. When matched with talent, we are blessed with successful leaders. And when it’s not, we get Liz Truss.

It’s not just politics either. I was intrigued to see Prince Harry – who, as far as I know, doesn’t have a global reputation as a business leader – telling 700 CEOs at a summit in San Francisco that they should “individually grow themselves” to “scale up their companies”. What unutterable guff. I’m sure he’s a lovely guy, but a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

Most of us probably know someone a bit like this. There was a journalist when I first started working who would regularly tell people that he was the best reporter in Scotland. He said it so often, and with such confidence, that many started to believe him. He’s now very successful abroad. It was only later that I realised he was all smoke and mirrors.

Apologies male readers but I think men, as I mentioned earlier, are much more guilty of this than women. You tell any female colleague that they have done a good job or excelled at something and the reply is invariably, “Oh, not really, it was rubbish,” or, “It wasn’t that great”.

Getting a man to come on telly as a guest is often much easier than a woman as guys seem to have a lot more confidence talking about stuff. And even if they’re not experts, heck, they will give it a go.

We need to get over that. STV has been running media training sessions for women from the country’s business community over the last few years to empower them to share their knowledge. It’s been a huge success.

The days of white men in suits dominating panel discussions are long gone. Recently I presented a programme that only had female guests. It wasn’t deliberate and we really didn’t think it was a big deal, but it is evidence that we are making progress.