Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

The Sunday Post View: Ministers’ disrespect of MSPs is a disgrace piled upon a scandal but the truth will out. It always does

Post Thumbnail

The bookies would have stopped taking bets a long time ago.

Given Scotland’s enduring enthusiasm for yes and no questions, it was a sure thing the work of the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints would eventually become a black and white issue.

As partisans on each side attempt to shout away every shade of grey, we are encouraged to believe that either the Scottish Government was simply and solely motivated by doing the right thing for women harassed in the workplace, specifically the two who first complained about Alex Salmond’s alleged behaviour.

Or, if not, we must believe the Scottish Government was solely motivated in doing down the former first minister and, after making a £750,000 skip fire of its own investigation, was determined to ensure and encourage his prosecution, assumed conviction and potential incarceration.

As ever in Scotland, the most clamorous, emptiest vessels insist the choice is clear. We must either be Team Sturgeon or Team Salmond. Either on the side of wronged women or on the side of a former first minister accused of wronging them. Either on the side of a politician whose career, reputation and liberty was threatened by a political conspiracy or on the side of his successor accused of orchestrating the conspirers.

The only choice we should be making, however, is to demand the facts are made known but, whatever information this committee of MSPs is given or not given, whatever it does or does not decide, the truth will eventually emerge. It always does.

Misled, divided, obstructed and racing the clock: Salmond Inquiry MSPs reveal an investigation in crisis

The committee was assembled to investigate how the government made such a howling Horlicks of its investigation into Salmond and it is clearly relevant to their work if that process was, at any point, shaped by a determination to encourage and ensure his criminal prosecution.

Well, how’s that working out? If anyone is still confident these MSPs will establish the truth in the few, short weeks it has left, we have a nice parliament to sell them.

The government clearly believes it is too complicated, that there is too little sympathy for Salmond, and that people, in the maelstrom of a global pandemic, simply don’t care that much.

Maybe they’re correct but a former first minister of Scotland is accusing his successor of conspiring to put him in the dock on grave and appalling charges, abusing her power and influence over prosecutors and police in the process. She flatly denies it but who’s right? Who knows?

Certainly not us, the people who pay the wages of the ministers, civil servants and special advisers. Nor, apparently, the committee of our elected representatives charged with finding out on our behalf.

We said last week that ministers’ disrespect of this committee, their refusal to deliver the information it has asked for, their stonewalling and time-wasting, is a disgrace. In truth, it is worse than that.

This committee deserves far better. Every one of us deserves far better.