Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Kenny Dalglish: When I played, I never went down if I didn’t need to. I tried my best to respect my opponent

Liverpool's Dejan Lovren (R) fouls Everton's Dominic Calvert-Lewin (L) in the penalty box during the English Premier League soccer match between Liverpool FC and Everton FC at Anfield in Liverpool (PETER POWELL/EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock)
Liverpool's Dejan Lovren (R) fouls Everton's Dominic Calvert-Lewin (L) in the penalty box during the English Premier League soccer match between Liverpool FC and Everton FC at Anfield in Liverpool (PETER POWELL/EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock)

THERE has been huge debate in England in the past week over whether certain players have dived or not during games.

The main argument is over whether it has been right to hand out retrospective punishments using TV evidence by a panel selected by the FA.

As I have said many times in this column, I have sympathy for referees and their assistants as they have an extremely-difficult job. Of that there is no doubt.

I’m all for trying to help them as much as possible because the most important thing is that we try to get every decision right in every game.

But not every decision can be a matter of fact. Many calls made in games are a matter of opinion.

Two such incidents come to mind from the past couple of weeks.

Last Saturday, West Ham were awarded a penalty when Mario Lanzini went down inside the box after a challenge from Stoke’s Erik Pieters.

After the game, the FA reviewed the incident and charged the player with “successful deception of a match official”.

He was given a two-game ban. Lanzini appealed it but the decision was upheld.

David Moyes was furious and stated that the referee was 10 yards away from the incident, and his original decision should be allowed to stand.

There is a point to that. You don’t want to be over-ruling the referees every weekend.

That could create a disharmony between them and the governing bodies and crush their confidence.

So we must allow for human error. We cannot micro-manage every decision in every game.

Another element is that when the FA decide that there is a case to answer for any such decisions and order a review, can an impartial process be guaranteed?

I only put that out there because the panel making the decision will have been brought in by the FA.

Also, if you are being punished, you can send in a letter to explain your side of the story.

However, surely a player should be allowed to attend in person and explain the situation face-to-face? That should be a given right.

The principle of retrospective action is correct because we want to see blatant diving being punished.

But implementing flaw-free system and process won’t be straightforward.

I think it’s about referees having as much insightful education on the game as possible.

The other example I was going to cite was the penalty awarded to Everton in the Merseyside derby at Anfield last Sunday.

Dejan Lovren was penalised for a challenge on Dominic Calvert-Lewin. Referee Craig Pawson pointed to the spot.

Now, my view is that the angle of the run taken by the Everton player put him directly into the path of the oncoming Lovren, and contact was unavoidable.

But it was not a deliberate foul by the Liverpool player. So I don’t think it was a penalty. Again, of course, it’s all a matter of opinion.

But it comes back to my point of referees needing to have a greater understanding of the game.

It’s like when a player sees a tackle coming, and deliberately “rides” the challenge.

That is not him diving or trying to get the opposition player a booking or red card.

He is anticipating something and he does what he needs to do to avoid it.

What is a player meant to do? Stand there and take a broken leg? It’s about taking evasive action.

When I was a player, I never dived. My priority was doing what I could to score a goal.

I never went down if I didn’t need to. I tried my best to be honourable on the pitch and respect my opponent.

As the season goes on, there is no doubt there will be many more incidents up for debate, with managers, pundits, and former referees going over in fine detail.

Indeed, in the English League Cup semi-final next month the VAR (Video Assistant Referee) system will be used in both legs of the game between Chelsea and Arsenal.

It seems to be a successful system and FIFA are keen to have it in place for next summer’s World Cup Finals.

The other semi-final is between Manchester City and Bristol City, and it was a great footballing story to see Lee Johnson’s team emerge victorious against Manchester United.

And I’m not just saying that because they beat United!

Every now and again, our game needs that fairytale element to keep us all going, and give smaller clubs the feeling of being a giant-killer and upsetting the odds.

It can’t do any harm.