Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Brexit was put above all else: Experts chart the rise of English nationalism and why it is putting strain on a Union already under stress

© Isabel Infantes/ShutterstockPrevious UKIP leader, Nigel Farage.
Previous UKIP leader, Nigel Farage.

Nationalism, independence and the constitution have dominated political debate for years. There is a febrile unease with the status quo and a sneaking but growing suspicion that neighbours are getting things easier, enjoying life a little more. Change is indubitably in the air…in England.

The rise of English ­nationalism, behind and beyond Brexit, is an increasingly potent political force south of the border and, experts suspect, could easily play as pivotal a role in the future of the United Kingdom as Scottish, Welsh or Irish nationalism.

Academic Richard Wyn Jones says English nationalism has two faces: “It combines a sense of English ­ identity and a sense that English identity isn’t properly recognised within the UK, and a Scottish-focused grievance that England is actually unfairly treated within the UK in some ways.

“It combines that focus on England, with a fierce pride in Britain’s past and a commitment to a particular vision of Britain’s place in the world, which is a really big role.”

That world view was ­particularly challenged by the perceived ­intrusion of the European Union in British public life. “European membership was seen as undermining the traditional English sense of where sovereignty should reside and how we should be legitimately governed,” says Wyn Jones.

“So European membership led to a significant backlash, especially amongst those people who feel English. Sstatistically there was a very obvious correlation between how English you felt and how Eurosceptic you were.”

This English nationalism threatens the Union in two ways, according to Wyn Jones. It brought about the Brexit referendum, which, through its geographically different results, has led to Scotland and Northern Ireland leaving the EU against the wishes of the majority of its citizens, reviving the cause of Scottish independence after the 2014 referendum defeat. But, after that referendum, English nationalism put completing Brexit above all else.

Wyn Jones, who is director of Cardiff University’s Wales Governance Centre and Dean of Public Affairs, adds: “English Eurosceptics prioritise leaving the EU, and have prioritised leaving the EU, above maintaining the UK Union, which is why we have the situation where there is now an economic border in the Irish sea between Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

“That is a very, very obvious ­example of Brexit being valued above the future of the UK and we know that one of the really striking things about attitudes in England is that the more English you feel the more relaxed you are about the territorial integrity of the state.”

In a new book, Englishness: The Political Force Transforming Britain, Wyn Jones and Edinburgh academic Ailsa Henderson examine the impact of English nationalism on the United Kingdom and reveal polling showing a rising number of English voters are relaxed about independence for all.

He said: “Actually, there isn’t ­majority support for Northern Ireland remaining in the UK in England, but even in terms of Scotland and Wales there is a significant minority in England, and that significant minority is found amongst those people who feel most English, who are ­actually quite relaxed about those countries becoming independent.”

While English nationalists don’t reject Britain’s nations remaining as one state, they see a future very much on England’s terms.

“The vision of what the UK would look like is one where Scotland and Wales remain in the Union, but in Scotland’s case with substantially less public spending, with very little voice in terms of the way the UK is run. So, effectively, Scotland would be largely autonomous but largely without influence in terms with the way that the UK is run, that will be fine for the English, but I am not sure it would be fine for the Scots.”

The key moment in the rise of English nationalism was the 2015 General Election when, Wyn Jones says, the Conservative Party deliberately played to English voters’ concerns.

“The way they won that ­election was very, very clearly by raising the bogey of Scottish influence – well, you could say SNP influence – over a Labour minority government but, as we show in the book, the people involved in putting the campaign together were very, very well aware that they were tapping into deeper English resentment and grievance, it was not just about the SNP.

“What they did in 2015 quite deliberately has triggered all kinds of tensions that threaten the future of the UK.”

Wyn Jones concludes the future of the United Kingdom is very uncertain, and has doubts about the likely success of any of the strategies currently suggested by unionists to save it, including the recently announced relocation of 1,000 civil service jobs from Whitehall to Scotland.

Britain’s political landscape has changed, he says, and English nationalism is here to stay.

“There’s been a tendency to think of nationalism, national identity, as only being relevant when you think about northern Ireland, or Scotland, or Wales,” he says.

“Actually what you have got ­everywhere across the UK is this kind of complicated web of national identities which intersect with values, world views. And, so, if you want to understand British politics, you have to talk about England in a way that is very unfamiliar to us.”