Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Class pay gap shows Britain remains ‘deeply elitist’, finds mobility report

The study found that medicine, law, journalism and academia continue to be dominated by the middle classes (iStock, AVNphotolab )
The study found that medicine, law, journalism and academia continue to be dominated by the middle classes (iStock, AVNphotolab )

 

PROFESSIONALS from working class backgrounds are paid £6,800 less than colleagues who had affluent upbringings, research has found.

Women and ethnic minorities face a “double disadvantage” that means their earnings are hit even harder, according to the Social Mobility Commission report.

The 17% pay gap shows that Britain remains a “deeply elitist” society, chairman Alan Milburn said.

Medicine, law, journalism and academia continue to be dominated the middle classes, the study found.

Mr Milburn, a former Labour cabinet minister, said: “This unprecedented research provides powerful new evidence that Britain remains a deeply elitist society.

“Too many people from working class backgrounds not only face barriers getting into the professions, but also barriers to getting on. It cannot be right that they face an annual class pay gap of £6,800.

“Many professional firms are doing excellent work to open their doors to people from all backgrounds, but this research suggests much more needs to be done to ensure that Britain is a place where everyone has an equal chance of success regardless of where they have come from.

“How much you are paid should be determined by your ability not your background. Employers need to take action to end the shocking class earnings penalty.”

The research, carried out by academics from the London School of Economics and University College London, looked at the average earnings of people from different backgrounds within the professions and found those who had a poorer start in life lost out by around £6,800 a year.

It found the gap was partly caused by differences in educational background, along with the tendency among the middle classes to work in bigger firms and head to London.

But even when professionals had the same educational attainment, role and experience, those from poorer backgrounds were paid an average of £2,242 less, the study found.

Finance had the biggest earnings gap at £13,713, followed by medicine on £10,218, and IT on £4,736.

The study found men from professional and managerial backgrounds earn 21% more than working class women in the professions.

All black and minority ethnic professionals, except those who are Chinese, earned less than similar white colleagues.

The report found professionals from poorer backgrounds may be less likely to ask for pay rises, and do not have the same networks and opportunities as their counterparts.

It suggested there could also be conscious or unconscious discrimination among employers.

The study used information from the UK Labour Force Survey, which has more than 90,000 respondents.

It found social mobility is “the norm and not the exception” because 48% of people rise up the ladder from their parents’ position compared with 31% who slide down.

But there continue to be “strong barriers” to equality of opportunity.

Sam Friedman, from the LSE, said: “We have found evidence of a powerful and largely unacknowledged pay gap within the professions. There are a number of reasons for his such as higher educational attainment among the privileged. But even when these factors are taken into account, this gap remains significant.”