Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

REVEALED: £10m of taxpayers’ money was given to art school after blaze. Not one penny was spent on fire damage

© Jeff J Mitchell/Getty ImagesSpecialist carpenters from Lawrence McIntosh install the floor to the bookstore above the Mackintosh Library on November 22, 2017 in Glasgow, Scotland.The original floor was suspended from beams above the book store by metal stirrups which survived the fire and are being retained in the restored building Restoration of Glasgow School.
Specialist carpenters from Lawrence McIntosh install the floor to the bookstore above the Mackintosh Library on November 22, 2017 in Glasgow, Scotland.The original floor was suspended from beams above the book store by metal stirrups which survived the fire and are being retained in the restored building Restoration of Glasgow School.

None of the £10 ­million of ­taxpayers’ money given to Glasgow School of Art after a devastating fire in 2014 was spent repairing the damage done by the blaze, we can reveal.

Insurance money paid for the restoration of the fire-­damaged west wing of the iconic Mackintosh building, with millions of pounds given in public donations and ­government support going to refurbish the undamaged east wing and help fund a campus expansion plan announced two years after the blaze.

The art school is facing ­mounting pressure after a Sunday Post investigation last week exposed how insurance money repaired the fire damage despite supporters being urged to donate to “restore the Mack”.

A £5m payment from Westminster was given to the art school to help buy Stow College as part of the campus plans but another £5m meant to help repair the Mackintosh was never handed over because the art school could not convince the Treasury it was needed.

However, the Scottish Government did give the art school £5m, originally promised to rebuild the world-famous building in Glasgow designed by Charles Rennie Mackintosh.

First Minister Alex Salmond promised the money four days after the blaze in 2014 when the Scottish Government announced “funds raised to restore the Glasgow School of Art’s fire-damaged Mackintosh building to its former glory will be matched by the Scottish Government.”

However, on Friday, the Scottish Government said the money was spent refurbishing parts of the building untouched by the fire.

MSPs yesterday joined growing calls for a public inquiry to establish exactly how and where the money was raised and spent.

Claire Baker, Scottish Labour’s culture spokeswoman, is to write to the Government demanding answers over the donation.

She said: “I welcome the Sunday Post’s investigative work on this issue and I am writing to the Scottish Government to demand a full explanation of the money they committed.

“Whether intended or not, the clear impression given at the time was that £5m was for restoration costs, and the Scottish Government needs to explain why its support was diverted to other work and, given recent events, if it is still confident it was an appropriate use of public money.”

About 10% of the historic ­building was destroyed after a student’s art project ignited on May 23, 2014, including the famous wood-panelled library.

On May 27, 2014, Mr Salmond said: “The Mack is an extraordinary building. It is an architectural gem and the artistic heart of Glasgow. It can and will be restored, and every­thing that can be done must be done to deliver this.

“That is why the Scottish Government is committed to providing an appropriate level of financial support and we will, in the first instance, provide up to £5m match-funding for the GSA’s Mackintosh Building Fire Appeal.”

A press release added: “This funding will be in addition to any longer-term funding requirements for building recovery and restoration, and which will be supported by the Scottish Government and its agencies following full evaluation of insurance liability.”

© (Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images
Fire fighters battle a blaze at the Mackintosh Building.

Last week, the Sunday Post revealed how a global fund­raising campaign, stressing the need to restore the fire-damaged Mackintosh building, was under scrutiny after the school collected around £50m from insurers.

At least £20m was donated to help the school but, two years after the fire, management announced a huge expansion plan aimed at increasing the number of students – many from overseas and paying up to £20,000 a year to study there – by 25%. The plans included the purchase of Stow College for £6m before an £8m refurbishment.

Managers and board members may now be asked back before MSPs to answer questions over the fundraising appeal, once the official fire investigation report is published next month.

And the escalating questions over the fundraising campaign in the aftermath of the 2014 fire have reinforced calls for a public inquiry with judicial powers.

Joan McAlpine, the culture committee’s convener, said the need for a full public inquiry, recommended by the committee after their hearings, was more pressing than ever. She said: “The Post’s investigation adds weight to our main recommendation that a full public enquiry with judicial powers should examine this whole affair.”

The Scottish Government money was paid to GSA in February 2018 via the Scottish Funding Council after proof was provided that it had raised £5m through its own efforts.

But a similar pledge of £5m from the UK Government has not yet been paid as it was conditional on the GSA proving that it needed the money for the rebuild.

On Friday, the Scottish Government said: “The 2014 fire did not extend to the whole of the Mackintosh building. The insurance payment covered the restoration of the damaged (west) wing.

“However, to ensure the long-term integrity of the building, the decision was taken to carry out refurbishment and restoration of the whole building. The insurance payment did not cover these additional costs.

“The additional costs were covered by the £5m provided by the Scottish Government and funding from the fundraising campaign.

“Glasgow School of Art spent the money in the way it was intended, given the need to extend the refurbishment beyond those parts of the building damaged in the fire and covered by insurance.

“The Scottish Government expects the highest standards of financial probity from all of the institutions it provides funding to. In particular, Higher Education Institutions must comply with the SFC’s terms and conditions of grant.”

A GSA spokeswoman said: “An appeal was set up in the immediate aftermath of the 2014 fire ‘enabling The Glasgow School of Art to recover from the consequences of the fire’ and in 2016 The Mackintosh Campus Appeal was launched to support a more holistic approach to the Mackintosh Building restoration and the recovery from the consequences of the fire, which had become clearer.

“This involved the restoration of the west wing – funded by insurance – and the upgrade and refurbishment of the east wing, funded by GSA’s own reserves and generous donations.”

“It is also important to note the purchase of the Stow Building was funded by a specific grant from the UK Treasury and is a replacement for buildings including the JD Kelly, Richmond and Tontine and not an expansion of the GSA campus.”


£100,000? A small sum in many ways

The director of Glasgow School of Art called £100,000 “a small sum in many ways” in an email to the Scottish Funding Council (SFC).

Professor Tom Inns wrote to the SFC in January 2016 to complain that the UK Government was withholding a £5 million donation for rebuilding the Mackintosh building. He said that, if the school had received the money earlier, it would have accrued up to £100,000 in interest, adding it was a “small sum in many ways but not inconsequential”.

He also sent an email to the SFC – an education-funding quango – saying he was “reframing” a fundraising drive for the Mackintosh building weeks after getting an insurance payout.

The Sunday Post can reveal details of the principle payout and how the school’s plans changed for the first time after obtaining 48 pages of emails between the school and public bodies.

Royal Sun Alliance, the main insurers, paid more than £45m to the GSA after negotiations were concluded, while accounts suggest another £4.3m was received from another insurer.

Professor Inns, who stood down suddenly from the GSA last year, wrote to the SFC to say they had received a “very fair and helpful settlement”.

He said the GSA was keen to expand its campus to deal with increasing student numbers, and buying the former Stow College building had been identified as a solution.

The purchase could be financed through a “portfolio of sources”.

By 2016, the GSA’s original plans to raise up to £35m to restore The Mack had morphed into a £80m plan to transform the campus, including the Stow purchase.

Professor Inns said: “GSA plans to make a public statement/relaunch its Mackintosh appeal towards the end of March 2016.

“This will slightly reframe exactly what the GSA needs external funding for.

“The Stow College development plans are integral to restoration of the Mackintosh building.”


We donated £6,500. It was a lot for us but we didn’t know about the insurance

A community arts organisation which donated £6,500 to the art school after the 2014 fire yesterday said it had no idea insurance money would rebuild the Mackintosh building.

The organisers of a Glasgow Girls exhibition in KIrkcudbright in 2014 handed over small cash donations made by visitors.

Joe Campbell, then-chairman of Kirkcudbright 2000, says they should have been told the money was not needed to rebuild the Mackintosh building.

He said: “There’s been a lack of transparency, obviously.

“No one was told the insurance company had covered the costs. I don’t know that anybody has deliberately led us up the garden path but I think they should have come back to those who donated and said this is not going to be used for the purpose you thought.

“Without question when we then asked the public to donate, we would have told them it was likely the insurance company was going to meet the bill.”

Mr Campbell said the donation from Kirkcudbright 2000 – half of the proceeds generated by the Glasgow Girls 1920-1960 exhibition – could have been used to fund projects in the town.

He added that the money was a significant sum as the group has struggled to raise funds and relied on well-wishers giving “a fiver or a tenner”.

He said: “We were not big donors because we didn’t have an awful lot.

“But we gave the money that we did in all good faith towards the reincarnation of what was there before, which was really so important to Scottish art.

“We had no idea that the costs of the rebuild were going to be covered by the insurance policy.

“It was in all good faith because it was such an integral part of Scottish art and particularly in Kirkcudbright which is an artists’ town.

“All the well-known painters who lived in Kirkcudbright at the turn of the century – and ever since – were trained at the Glasgow School of Art, so it was very dear to our hearts.”