Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Where will Wayne Rooney line up for England?

Post Thumbnail

Will Roy Hodgson become a diamond geezer to include Wayne?

Where will Wayne Rooney line up for England?

That has been the big talking point this past week.

Gary Lineker knows that whatever plan Roy Hodgson has devised to get the best out of Rooney, it could be in the dustbin by this time next week.

Where the Manchester United man plays against Italy in Manaus and even if he should play at all has been the prime topic of conversation in Miami for the last six days.

Never has the talismanic striker been under so much scrutiny for his international place, with Hodgson using him in a variety of positions in this week’s friendlies.

But Lineker’s personal experience at two World Cups leads him to believe that whatever option the manager settles on, outside circumstances will end up dictating his choices.

“Roy is evolving his system,” says Lineker, who heads the BBC team in Brazil. “He’s often played 4-3-3, which has worked quite well, but he could play with the diamond like Liverpool.

“That might be the only way you can get Daniel Sturridge in the middle and Rooney in a position that suits.

“If he doesn’t play that way, one of them would have to play out of position or be left out.

“But whatever Roy decides, he’s got a 23-man squad and events will always transpire within a tournament that make you think differently.

“For instance, we started really slowly in Mexico in ‘86. We lost to Portugal in the first game and everything went wrong against Morocco.

“It was 0-0, Ray Wilkins was sent off and Bryan Robson got injured. It meant we had to win the last game and Bobby Robson just changed things round.

“It was the first time ever we’d played with one up front me and someone in the hole Peter Beardsley. It wasn’t planned but it worked.

“In 1990, we switched to three at the back. There’s always been this myth that it was player power that dictated it but Bobby asked our opinion and went away and made the decision. It worked for us because it freed us up.

“England have been constrained by 4-4-2 two strikers, two midfield players, two wide players. All we ever do generally at World Cups is chase the ball, not getting a kick.

“That system is so easy to play against, especially through the middle.

“That’s why it was like having the shackles taken off at Italia 90. All of a sudden players could find space. They weren’t stuck in positions all the time, easy to mark.

“That’s something Roy has to think about in this World Cup. To make sure we’re not to be drawn into that.”

Lineker got under Hodgson’s skin earlier in the season when he tweeted during the goalless draw in Ukraine that the manager was “taking England back to the Dark Ages” by employing a rigid 4-4-2.

“It was just one game that was dour and I said we’d gone backwards,” he says.

“I used the phrase ‘Dark Ages’ and that was probably a bit unfair.

“I think it’s really important for me to say that in a lot of the qualifying games I really liked what England were doing.

“We’d played 4-3-3 in a quite a few matches, it had worked really well and I’d given them a lot of credit.”