Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Partnership of investors is the best hope for Rangers

Partnership of investors is the best hope for Rangers

“It is when there is a lack of transparency that problems can occur.”

We have been hearing a lot about fan ownership recently.

Hearts, Hibs and Rangers have all been in the news and there has been a lot of debate about the potential benefits and pitfalls for clubs involved.

There are two distinct types of fan ownership.

In the first, a wealthy supporter bankrolls his, or her, team out of love.

The perfect example would be the late Eddie Thompson at Dundee United.

Eddie was a great backer of the Tangerines, who used to take his place among the travelling support when they were away from home.

But I think I am right in saying he would have felt the pressure to make sure the side was the very best it possibly could be.

Even to the extent of spending more on players than was perhaps advisable at times. In all cases, the business model has to be sustainable.

It is precisely because of the problems at Hearts and Rangers we have seen the movements to bring in the second type of fan ownership.

This is where supporters group together to provide collective backing, whether financial or skills. The most famous example is at Barcelona, where the club is owned by the support.

It can work very well. You just need to look at the backing Hearts and Rangers received from appeals to their support at their times of greatest need to see the potential there is there.

I have consistently stated my view that Rangers’ best hope is for the club to be run by a partnership of investors, and I would certainly like to see a fans element involved.

Ideally, this would involve fans playing an active part in the business by investing funds.

However, even if we were just talking about a supporters’ representative on the Board, it is vital. They can then report back to fans groups.

That would allow them to see the figures and, through that access, be able to reassure fellow supporters everything is being properly run. Or, if such information is not forthcoming, demand it be made available.

I know from my own experience at Rangers prior to the dark days of 2012 and beyond it is when there is a lack of transparency that problems can occur.