Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Liverpool threat forced Glazers to act

Post Thumbnail

The re-emergence of Liverpool as potential title-winners and Champions League contenders for years to come poses the most significant threat yet to Manchester United’s global commercial dominance.

That’s why the Glazer family acted so decisively when they sacked David Moyes.

Of course, there were many valid football reasons too. But the real fear at Old Trafford is a possible second season with them outside Europe’s elite competition while Liverpool are banking the hugely increased TV revenues coming in 2015.

The financial whizzes who have helped United become the best-supported club in the world are worried that Liverpool will hoover up a sizeable percentage of their fans.

We’re talking here about floating voters mainly in the Far East who follow success and have no long-standing family allegiances.

They just want to be associated with a club that wins trophies and have players who excite the casual, often female, fan.

Liverpool have more potential to damage United commercially than Manchester City, Arsenal or Chelsea because they have history.

When a club with history suddenly becomes successful again especially if they do so with a young, attractive, media-friendly side it’s the perfect recipe for commercial boom time.

United themselves provide the blueprint.

They, too, had history, but it took the success of the mid-nineties spearheaded by the dashing cavaliers of the Class of 92 for them to really take off.

Since then, a whole new world has opened up for them and the club has ruthlessly exploited it.

In recent weeks they have announced sponsorship deals from Thai confectioners, a Maltese bank and a Taiwanese tyre manufacturer.

But that sort of clout is based on the all-conquering United of the Ferguson years, who were ever-presents in the global showcase of the Champions League.

United may be able to live without the £30m one year in the wilderness would cost. But the following season, the prize for getting through the group stages will be more than £40m. That’s serious money.

Manchester City and Chelsea will still have mega-rich owners and Arsenal will still have fortunes stashed in the bank. But Liverpool are the problem. The Champions League will give them one new stream of income. The 9,000-seat extension at Anfield will give them another.

On the field, they are not going away. Off the field, that could mean disaster for United.