Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Critics should give Hodgson a break

Post Thumbnail

The entertainment value of last Tuesday’s match in Kiev was such that if there was a freshly-painted fence handy, watching it dry might have been slightly more engrossing.

That, though, isn’t the point. The only thing that mattered in Ukraine was that England didn’t get beaten.

It was unrealistic to expect free-flowing football in a match of such significance to the outcome of the group, particularly considering the visitors’ injury list.

It was a night to get organised, dig in and fly home still on course to qualify for Brazil.

That’s exactly what Roy Hodgson did and he ought to be given credit.

His one mistake was to then describe the match as “good quality” when it clearly wasn’t.

Gary Lineker is in the habit these days of causing something of a tabloid firestorm with his international night tweeting.

He accused Hodgson of taking England back to the Dark Ages a few months ago, and after the draw in Kiev he described them as awful.

That sort of stuff is meat and drink for headline-writers, and Hodgson doesn’t have too many champions in the media.

He’s been lampooned for the way he speaks, and lambasted for discussing team selection with fans on the London Underground.

He’s a pleasant man with little obvious charisma, and that doesn’t tick the right boxes for those who crave the brashness of Jose Mourinho or the chatty chumminess of Harry Redknapp.

Kevin Keegan once famously said: “If you’re looking for a manager to get a 0-0 draw in Ukraine, I’m not the man.”

Hodgson is exactly the man. To him, a draw away from home is always acceptable and usually achievable.

He has always been regarded as a pragmatic, unambitious coach.

His record of one defeat in 20 matches hasn’t altered that perception because there have been too many draws in matches that count.

That has to change next month.

The much-repeated mantra “it’s in our hands now” assumes that victories over Montenegro and Poland at Wembley are mere formalities.

Anyone who has watched England struggle at home under successive managers will know that’s a big assumption.

But, remember, the victories don’t have to be impressive. Two boring 1-0 wins will do nicely.

We’re at the stage of a qualification campaign that Sir Alex Ferguson would describe as “squeaky bum time.”

It’s when character and professionalism become more important than putting on a show.

This England manager may never send out a team that gets the audience out of their seats.

But, at the moment, that’s not his job.