Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Post Office to hand over document on Nick Read allegations to MPs

Nick Read, chief executive of the Post Office, gave evidence to the committee last week (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA)
Nick Read, chief executive of the Post Office, gave evidence to the committee last week (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA)

The Post Office will hand over a document detailing allegations made against chief executive Nick Read to MPs, a board director has said.

Ben Tidswell, a senior independent director on the Post Office Board, confirmed to the Business and Trade Committee that an external barrister-led investigation into Mr Read’s conduct was under way.

Mr Tidswell said an 80-page document referenced by former chairman Henry Staunton at the committee last week could actually be a 12-page document which includes some allegations against Mr Read, as well as others.

The board director said the 80-page document referred to by Mr Staunton was “relating to a separate investigation into another individual”.

Post Office Horizon IT scandal
Former Post Office chairman Henry Staunton addressed MPs last week (Lucy North/PA)

The Post Office initially said it was unable to disclose the document to MPs because it would “undermine” the investigation – but reversed the decision having received “strong commitments on protecting data and the individuals referenced in the documents” from the committee.

In a letter on Tuesday, Mr Tidswell said his understanding was that the committee recognised “the very serious public interest in, and importance of, protecting whistleblowing/Speak Up processes (both generally and in relation to the Post Office) will weigh heavily against disclosure when balanced with the wider public interest.”

Mr Byrne had told the board director it was “highly unlikely” the document would be published and if it was, it would “almost certainly be subject to comprehensive redaction to safeguard individuals and data”.

Mr Tidswell said the Post Office would expect to be in a position to disclose the documents by 9am on Wednesday.

Mr Staunton previously told the committee that a document was compiled by the company’s HR director after they “fell out” with Mr Read.

The Post Office director said the chief executive was going to resign because he was “unhappy with his pay”.

Mr Tidswell said the investigation process was due to conclude by the end of March or early April.

In his initial letter to Mr Byrne dated February 29, the board director said:  “It appeared as though Mr Staunton, when he gave evidence on Tuesday, was holding up the terms of reference for a Speak Up process.

“However, we think he may actually have been referring to a 12-page Speak Up document which raises a number of allegations, some of which I believe relate to Mr Read, but a number of which do not.

“In accordance with Post Office’s Speak Up process on whistleblowing, these allegations are being investigated by an external barrister.

“This investigation is still ongoing and Mr Read and others within Post Office are fully co-operating with this investigation.

“At present, it is anticipated that the investigation will be concluded by the end of March/early April.”

In Tuesday’s letter, Mr Tidswell added: “We greatly value your commitment to safeguarding data and individuals referred to in an external whistleblowing investigation, and your belief that it would be highly unlikely that the committee would resolve to publish the documents that you have requested unless there was a public interest in doing so and, even then, only with proper redactions to protect the rights and interests of those individuals.

“My understanding is that you recognise that the very serious public interest in, and importance of, protecting whistleblowing/Speak Up processes (both generally and in relation to the Post Office) will weigh heavily against disclosure when balanced with the wider public interest.”

Mr Tidswell said the Post Office would be willing to provide a summary of the findings to the committee once the investigation has concluded.

The Horizon IT scandal saw more than 700 subpostmasters prosecuted by the Post Office and handed criminal convictions between 1999 and 2015 as Fujitsu’s faulty Horizon system made it appear as though money was missing at their branches.

Hundreds of subpostmasters are still awaiting compensation despite the Government announcing those who have had convictions quashed are eligible for £600,000 payouts.