Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Minister wants Ukrainian visa process ‘easy as possible’ despite scheme closure

Tom Pursglove said he wants the visa process to be as ‘easy as possible’ for Ukrainians, despite the Government’s announcement that it will close the Ukraine family scheme (House of Commons/PA)
Tom Pursglove said he wants the visa process to be as ‘easy as possible’ for Ukrainians, despite the Government’s announcement that it will close the Ukraine family scheme (House of Commons/PA)

A Home Office minister said he wants the visa process to be “light touch” and “easy as possible” for Ukrainians, despite the Government’s announcement that it will close the Ukraine family scheme on Monday.

Tom Pursglove told the Commons that Ukrainians will continue to be offered sanctuary in the UK and any suggestion otherwise is “deliberate scaremongering”.

MPs criticised the move by the Home Office, stating it is “particularly cruel” to announce the end of the scheme as the two-year anniversary of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion approaches.

The decision to close the Ukraine family scheme, which allowed applicants to join family members or extend their stay in the UK, was announced among a series of changes to immigration rules set out in a policy document.

The document also confirmed a visa extension scheme, which meant Ukrainian nationals and their immediate relatives could apply for permission to remain in the country, will close on May 16.

During an urgent question on immigration on Tuesday, Mr Pursglove told MPs: “There will continue to be an in-country opportunity for people to apply to extend their visas.

“Through the homes for Ukraine scheme, Ukrainians will still be able to come to the UK to access that sanctuary that we are right to be proud in supporting and that we have seen communities across the country doing an enormous amount of positive welcome work to support that national effort.

“Any suggestion that that will not be the case moving forward is wrong and it’s deliberate scaremongering, and people should stop it.”

Independent MP Angus MacNeil (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) said the minister was “being economical with clarity here” and asked if reports of the family scheme closure were incorrect.

SNP MP Joanna Cherry (Jonathan Brady/PA)
SNP MP Joanna Cherry said the Government should be focusing on its existing immigration backlog rather than ‘distressing’ Ukrainian families (Jonathan Brady/PA)

Mr Pursglove said: “There will continue to be an out-of-country route through the homes for Ukraine scheme… as well as the extension to those visas.”

Later in the session, SNP MP Joanna Cherry said the Government should be focusing on its existing immigration backlog rather than “distressing Ukrainian families”.

The Edinburgh South West MP said: “If the purpose of yesterday’s announcement was to provide some reassurance to Ukrainian citizens who have sought refuge in the UK, why is the Government forcing these people to go through yet another application?

“Every member of this House will have experienced the problems supporting the initial applications, there will be delays, different family members will get confirmation at different times, children will be dropped off by mistake causing great distress.

“My question to the minister is this – shouldn’t UK VI (Visas and Immigration) be focusing on its existing backlog rather than adding unnecessary processes to its workload and distressing Ukrainian families who are now our constituents and are living in the United Kingdom?”

Mr Pursglove replied: “We think that this is an appropriate approach to extending those visas, it is right and proper that there is a proper process around that.

“There are obviously reasons why visas are handled in this particular way, there are safeguarding concerns that come into all of these matters when it comes to extensions as well, and that is the reason why we will take the approach that we are.

“But I want this to be as light touch as possible, I want this to be as easy as possible, and I think that all Parliamentarians in this House should be giving reassurance today about the fact that those Ukrainian people who are in our country, who are accessing that sanctuary will continue to be able to do so.”

Labour MP Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) said: “A lot of the people in this country, including my constituents, will be amazed that in this week – the week of (Alexei) Navalny’s murder by Putin and by the tough times that the Ukrainians are facing against the Russian re-enforcements – that this is the day they announce that there is going to be restrictions on Ukrainian families coming here.”

Mr Pursglove replied: “Ukrainians who are here will continue to be able to have that sanctuary in the years ahead.”

As of February 12, some 56,800 of the 200,200 arrivals were under the Ukraine family scheme. The remaining 143,400 arrivals were people granted visas under the separate homes for Ukraine scheme.

A total of 31,400 applications to extend permission to stay under the Ukraine family scheme and Ukraine extension scheme had been granted as of February 13, according to the latest data.

The Government website about the scheme now says: “You can no longer apply under this scheme.”

SNP MP Marion Fellows (Motherwell and Wishaw) said: “Closing the Ukrainian family scheme almost two years to the day since the anniversary of Putin’s illegal war is particularly cruel.”

While SNP home affairs spokesperson Alison Thewliss had earlier told the Commons that her party is “appalled” that the Government “had made it more difficult for Ukrainians to seek sanctuary here”.