Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Minister ‘angry’ after being kept in dark over death squad allegations

Minister for veterans’ affairs Johnny Mercer continued his evidence to the inquiry on Wednesday (Peter Byrne/PA)
Minister for veterans’ affairs Johnny Mercer continued his evidence to the inquiry on Wednesday (Peter Byrne/PA)

A minister has told an inquiry he was angry with former defence secretary Ben Wallace after discovering UK special forces officers knew about Afghanistan death squad allegations before he described them as untrue in the House of Commons.

Johnny Mercer wrote to Ben Wallace in August 2020 shortly after emails surfaced in The Sunday Times which showed senior special forces officers expressed serious concerns about the killings of 33 people in 11 night raids in the war-torn nation in 2011.

The letter, shown to the Afghanistan Inquiry on Wednesday, detailed how he told Mr Wallace it was “completely unacceptable” he had been allowed to make statements to the Commons in January 2020 when people knew them to be “incorrect”.

Mr Mercer said he was “angry” that the director of special forces, the chief of the general staff and the defence secretary had “not done their job that was incumbent upon them with their rank and privileges in those organisations”.

Ben Wallace
Johnny Mercer said his time under Ben Wallace was ‘very difficult’ (James Manning/PA)

He described his time working under Mr Wallace as “very difficult”, adding: “I did not enjoy it and it placed me in a number of very, very uncomfortable positions.”

The inquiry will examine whether a special forces unit, known to the probe as UKSF1, had a policy of executing males of “fighting age” who posed no threat in Afghanistan between 2010 and 2013.

Afghan families have accused UK special forces of conducting a “campaign of murder” against civilians, while senior officers and personnel at the Ministry of Defence “sought to prevent adequate investigation”.

In his letter to Mr Wallace in August 2020, Mr Mercer said: “That I have been allowed to read out statements to the House of Commons that individuals in strategic appointments in the department knew to be incorrect is completely unacceptable.

“These were clearly not complaints by a ‘small number of individuals within the investigations team’ but widespread.

“I have continually down-played these allegations in public too to support UKSF1 and the department. That was clearly a mistake.”

Mr Mercer told the then defence secretary that he wanted to formally request an opportunity to correct the record in the House of Commons.

Ending the letter, Mr Mercer said: “Finally, this whole episode makes me very sad.

“I – like you – have dedicated my political career to improving the lot of those who serve – both currently and veterans.

“I repeatedly warned against the outcome, and yet it has happened, and I have suffered significant reputational damage in my pursuit of ending vexatious claims that have ruined the lives of so many of our finest people.

“I will continue in this pursuit, but this boil must be lanced, and I can never be put in this position again.”

Asked by counsel to the inquiry Oliver Glasgow KC what the boil that must be lanced was, the minister said: “The allegations concerned with this inquiry.”

Mr Mercer said he raised his concerns about being kept in the dark with Mr Wallace and the chief of the defence staff on the phone while away on holiday in France.

He told the probe: “So there were two issues – one was it was completely unacceptable that I’d asked to see this information and the first I read about it was in The Sunday Times.

“Secondarily, I was very cross that I had been allowed to make a statement in the House of Commons in January that year that was clearly incorrect when faced with the evidence that existed within my own department – and for me that was a kind of red line being crossed, in terms of ‘we’re not on the same side here’.”

Mr Glasgow then asked: “So in effect, the concerns as you explained them – you were, would it be fair to say angry that you had not been told the true picture?”

Mr Mercer replied: “Mr Glasgow, I don’t disguise the fact that I am angry with these people.

“The fact I’m sat here today going through this is because they have not done their job that was incumbent upon them with their rank and privileges in those organisations – and yes, I’m angry about that.”

Mr Glasgow continued: “And when you say them, can you tell us who those individuals are?”

Mr Mercer said: “Senior leaders within the Ministry of Defence and within UKSF.”

The minister went on to confirm two of the individuals were the director of special forces and the chief of the general staff.

Mr Glasgow went on: “Secretary of state?”

Mr Mercer said: “Yeah, my time in that department was very difficult, I did not enjoy it and it placed me in a number of very, very uncomfortable positions.”

Two Royal Military Police investigations, codenamed Operation Northmoor and Operation Cestro, are set to be scrutinised by the inquiry.

No charges were brought under Operation Northmoor – a £10 million investigation which was set up in 2014 to examine allegations of executions by special forces, including those of children.

Operation Cestro saw three soldiers referred to the Service Prosecuting Authority, but none of them were prosecuted.

The inquiry continues.