Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fresh blow over oil for Salmond

Post Thumbnail

The energy expert who rubbished Alex Salmond’s claims on North Sea reserves last night dealt another blow to the Yes campaign over oil.

Tycoon Sir Ian Wood has claimed any post-Yes vote negotiations about oil could take up to four years and wreak havoc with the industry.

He also warned voters both sides of the referendum campaign are playing politics with “black gold”, claiming the UK Government is underplaying how much oil is left while the Yes campaign is grossly exaggerating the situation.

His latest intervention came as Treasury chief Danny Alexander claimed the lower oil output predicted by Sir Ian would result in public spending cuts or higher taxes in an independent Scotland.

In an interview with The Sunday Post, Sir Ian said the transition to independence is unlikely to be as smooth as promised by the SNP.

He said: “These are very complex negotiations in relation to boundary lines, how you regulate, transfer licences, decommissioning, etc.

“Companies will be dealing with two regimes, so I would say three or four years, I know Alex Salmond says it will happen in 18 months but it just won’t.”

Sir Ian, a businessman praised by both sides of the debate as the oil industry’s foremost expert, said last week the Yes camp’s claim that 24 billion barrels of oil remain in the North Sea were up to 60% too optimistic.

Asked if the Yes camp was not being honest, Sir Ian responded: “By a major sin of omission, yes.”

When questioned on whether the UK Government is underplaying the extent of oil reserves, he added: “Yes, but nothing like the same extent. I am sitting with a lot of inside knowledge which I’m not going to share but because I did the review I know what is going on.

“You have got key people on both sides and frankly they are adjusting the presentation and facts to try to get an advantage.

Renowned economist Sir Donald MacKay has said there is “no hole in the Scottish Government’s oil predictions” and backs the 24 billion barrels figure used by industry body Oil and Gas UK.

He said: “In forecasting output, the first source I looked at was the Wood review in which Ian Wood states that ‘a number of larger new fields are about to come on stream in the next two or three years and that could take production back to the level of two to three years ago’.”

Meanwhile, Alexander claimed the knock-on effect of Sir Ian’s projections could see an independent Scotland hit with a 5% cut in public spending.

He said: “What Sir Ian Wood’s figures show is that an independent Scotland, from day one, would have no choice but to make substantial increases to income tax.”