Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Absolute tosh’ that Government is dragging its feet on AI safety, minister says

Michelle Donelan, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, denied the Government has ‘dragged its feet’ on AI safety (James Manning/PA)
Michelle Donelan, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, denied the Government has ‘dragged its feet’ on AI safety (James Manning/PA)

Science Secretary Michelle Donelan has claimed it is “absolute tosh” to say the Government is dragging its feet on artificial intelligence (AI) safeguards.

Ms Donelan said the UK is leading the world when it comes to AI safety but added the Government is not going to rush legislation.

Meanwhile, Labour’s Alex Davies-Jones accused ministers of prioritising “a man’s right to have banter, over a woman’s right to feel safe” when it comes to deepfakes.

Speaking in the Commons, Labour MP Chris Elmore raised concerns over ministers saying they would “not rush to regulate”, adding the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has been clear in the “potential harms unregulated AI could generate”.

The Ogmore MP asked: “So why has the Government dragged its feet on safeguards for the most advanced AI models or is it simply that she’s waiting for the next Labour government to control the new AI models?”

Ms Donelan replied: “This is absolute tosh. We have led the world when it comes to AI safety, we have set up a long-term process in the AI safety summit and the next one will be in Seoul in just a few weeks, we have also set up the world’s first leading AI Safety Institute that is testing both pre and post-deployment.

“But we’ve also been really clear: we’re not going to rush to legislate. We’re going to grip the risks and better understand them rather than produce out-of-date legislation as a gimmick.”

Ms Donelan later declined to say which models the AI Safety Institute is testing as it is “highly commercially sensitive information”, adding: “Where risks are found we do expect relevant action to be taken and the responsibility of developers is to ensure their models are safe, but of course the Government is committed to holding them to account.”

MP for Pontypridd, Ms Davies-Jones called on the Government to take action on AI apps such as Nudify and ClothOff, which generate deepfake pornography.

She said: “Yesterday the Government finally backed Labour’s calls and announced they would be making the creation of deepfake porn an offence.

“But it is disappointing that the Government continue to adopt an intent-based approach, over one of consent in relation to these crimes.

“Why are ministers prioritising a man’s right to have banter, over a woman’s right to feel safe?

“And will the Government look at the regulation of the AI apps such as Nudify and ClothOff which are freely available, easy to use and exist only to humiliate and violate women?”

Ms Donelan replied: “We are in the process of making it illegal to create this content in the first place.”

Elsewhere, Conservative former minister Vicky Ford called for a dedicated child-safe phone to be created to protect children.

Ms Ford, MP for Chelmsford, said: “Given the increased concerns about children’s online safety, does she agree it is now time to go even further and introduce a child-safe phone, thus ensuring that at a minimum all phones intended for children are properly fitted with parental controls to stop children from accessing harmful content?”

Ms Donelan replied: “She does raise an important point regarding device-level controls and I can assure that I’m listening, not just to members of this House, but also to parents too.”