Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

2010 coalition deal ‘a piece of cake’ compared to 2015 expected general election outcome

Post Thumbnail

The 2010 coalition negotiation was a “piece of cake” compared to what looks likely after May’s General Election, the former cabinet secretary who brokered the Tory-Lib Dem government has said.

Sir Gus O’Donnell, who now sits in the House of Lords as Lord O’Donnell, said the process in 2010 was “extremely exciting” but warned that this time it would be a “longer” negotiation.

Speaking on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, he said his successor Sir Jeremy Heywood would have to plan for a much wider range of possibilities, including minority government and confidence and supply arrangements.

Lord O’Donnell said managing the resulting government could also be different as a fragile administration would have to avoid repeated crunch votes in the Commons – potentially meaning fewer new laws.

He said: “It was extremely exciting. You had a serious job to do, we didn’t have any precedents so it was quite difficult – there weren’t many people alive who knew about coalitions.

“But I think it was a piece of cake compared to what might happen this time, to be honest. That’s because if one looks at the predictions, and I think within the Civil Service my successor Sir Jeremy Heywood will be starting off with predictions, they will be preparing for all sorts of options.

“This time round I think they will include minority governments and possibly some kind of mix. There could be a party in coalition with a second party but having a supply and confidence deal with a third party.”

Lord O’Donnell revealed a supply and confidence agreement between the Tories and Liberal Democrats was drawn up last time but proved unnecessary after a deal for a full coalition was struck.

He added: “What you are trying to do is get to a stable, effective government. Where Sir Jeremy will be getting to now is not so much thinking about what options there might be but for each option how do we turn that into effective government?

“For example, they will be studying processes and tactics from the past – remember the first half of the last century there were more minority and coalition governments than not, so there is quite a lot of precedents to go on.

“They will also be thinking about how do we manage government when you don’t want to go to the House too often with very contentious votes? Instead of legislation, can you have other ways of doing things?

“We might have fewer laws, which I think if they are fewer, better thought-through, better legislated, could be good. They have the behavioural insights approach which says instead of heavy-handed regulation, can we nudge people towards the right thing?”

Lord O’Donnell said parties were clearly already signalling to each other about their priorities but warned this was unlikely to speed things up in May.

He said: “This time it might be a longer negotiation, it might take more time. It’s really hard to tell.”

“I think the fact is the Conservatives and Lib Dems have been in government together, they know each other very well, they know quite a lot of what really matters to each other.

“I think Labour in its manifesto is laying out what it thinks is really important. So there’s quite a lot of public foreplay, if you like, and we will see what is consummated in the weeks ahead.”