Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Union claims 999 bosses snubbed battered Maureen

Post Thumbnail

Call for inquiry into ‘failure’ to act on complaints.

Union chiefs have demanded an inquiry into claims ambulance bosses turned their backs on a paramedic who was crying out for help.

The GMB allege senior management at the Scottish Ambulance Service failed to help battered wife Maureen Gordon despite repeated pleas over a two-year period.

The 49-year-old’s case hit the headlines in June when her ambulance boss husband, Grant Gordon, also 49, was jailed for subjecting her to a campaign of terror.

Among the accusations levelled at him were that he abused his position in order to make Maureen’s life hell.

The sheriff who put Gordon behind bars slammed the SAS for failing to act upon Maureen’s complaints about the harassment.

Now the union representing her has called on Health Secretary Alex Neil to meet with them urgently to discuss the allegations.

Senior organiser Mick Conroy has put together a “damning” dossier which he claims exposes how ambulance bosses snubbed Maureen.

He said: “Ambulance service management have been heartless throughout this and have not supported Maureen in any way.

“The only support she has had has been from her frontline colleagues and her new ambulance service manager who did not take up that role until the trial against her husband had started.

“We are asking for a meeting with Alex Neil to discuss this case and are calling for an inquiry into how the SAS handled it.”

The GMB claims Maureen first told the SAS that her husband, who was general manager for ambulance services in Fife, the Forth Valley and Tayside, was harassing her in November 2010.

During this meeting she allegedly raised concerns that he was tracking her using the service’s computer system an offence he was eventually found guilty of in court.

The union says Maureen repeatedly asked for details of her shifts to be kept off the staff rota as she feared her husband was using it to stalk her.

But it’s claimed her request was never granted.

Maureen later secured a court order evicting her husband from the family home and preventing him from approaching her.

However, during this time she was sent letters from the SAS stating she would be required to attend his disciplinary hearing.

The letter said “Grant Gordon, or his chosen representative” would be allowed to ask her questions at the inquiry.

The union claims she was even told she could face disciplinary action if she did not attend.

Maureen says she also asked the SAS to inform her of what staff car her husband was driving as he had been following her.

At first, she was allegedly advised this would be possible. However, the union claims when she chased up an answer she was told the information was subject to data protection laws.

The union also accuses ambulance bosses of failing to pass on praise offered by a patient about Maureen.

Mr Conroy added: “They are giving her the cold shoulder, which is proved by her omission from a letter of commendation.”

At his trial at Airdrie Sheriff Court, Gordon was found guilty of six charges relating to incidents between April 2009 and May 2011, including two assaults.

As well as being put behind bars, Gordon was fined £500 and given a three-year non-harassment order for what the Sheriff described as one of the worst cases of domestic abuse he had seen.

A spokesman for the Scottish Ambulance Service said: “We do not comment on internal matters related to individual members of staff.

“There are clear mechanisms available to any member of staff to raise a grievance or concern and these were agreed in partnership with trade unions.”