Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Report slams police board expenses

Post Thumbnail

An auditors’ report has heavily criticised the Scottish Police Authority over its expenses policies.

Board members of Scotland’s police watchdog were paid expenses for attending meetings without having to prove they were actually there.

A damning audit of the expenses scheme for the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) reveals a string of lax procedures including board members being paid expenses without providing receipts. Spending watchdog Audit Scotland tested 15 expense claims by board members and found problems with 12 of them.

This included “no process in place for confirming members’ attendance at meetings when claiming for attendance allowance payments”.

Auditors also found board members were claiming different mileage for identical trips, not providing receipts to support claims and using vague descriptions for meetings and journeys.

The SPA was created to hold the country’s new single force Police Scotland to account and has 13 board members paid £300 for every day they work.

No board member has been accused of any wrongdoing and the SPA last night said it has strengthened its expenses policy in light of the Audit Scotland report.

But critics hit out at the police governing body. Scottish Conservative chief whip John Lamont said: “One of the main reasons for creating a single force was to save money.

“Efficiencies that are clearly being made elsewhere, not least the reduction of a frontline presence, risk being completely undermined by a sloppy expenses regime.

“This is taxpayers’ money, and when board members make a claim, it’s important they can show exactly what was claimed for and why.”

Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Alison McInnes MSP said: “This is not a great start for the body which is supposed to ensure accountability in our police. Twelve out of 15 claims for expenses were found to have issues by the Scotland’s independent auditing body. The Scottish Police Authority must act swiftly to tighten up procedures.”

Last year Audit Scotland concluded it was still not clear how Scotland’s new single police force plans to make an expected £1.1 billion of savings by 2026.

The watchdog said in November the SPA and Police Scotland, who have had disputes over how the new policing set-up should be managed, have still to agree a financial strategy showing how savings will be achieved beyond 2013/14,

A spokesman from the Scottish Police Authority said: “In the months leading up to and following April 1 2013, the SPA was rightly focused on delivering a smooth transition from the legacy police organisations to the new structures.

“Last October, Audit Scotland made several recommendations about how we could strengthen our policy covering members’ expenses. Our aim is to be as transparent as possible and therefore we accepted all of the recommendations made.

“We immediately updated our policy and introduced further spot checks as recommended.”