Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

How could little Daniel have slipped through the net?

Post Thumbnail

The innocent face of four-year-old Daniel Pelka in his school photograph should trouble the conscience of every adult who came into contact with him.

Why did no one notice the suffering this little boy endured at the hands of his callous mother Magdalena Luczak and stepfather Mariusz Krezolek who starved, tortured and beat him to death?

Last week a jury found them guilty of murder and they were each sentenced to a minimum of 30 years in jail. But what troubles me is that this little boy, like so many others in the past, slipped through the net.

Teachers, social workers, NHS staff and the police had all been involved in Daniel’s life but despite the fact that he “looked like a concentration camp victim” and was “a bag of bones” before his death, no one took action to save him.

His mother and stepfather hoodwinked the authorities. Time after time opportunities were missed to protect this child.

Teachers saw him stealing food from bins. Social services knew his mother waited 12 hours to take Daniel to hospital with a broken arm. Appointments with paediatricians were cancelled. Police visited the family home several times after domestic rows.

A serious case review into the tragedy will be completed in September. And yet again the NSPCC states: “Crucial questions need to be asked about how a youngster slipped through the child protection net.”

Is it because we, as a society, are too frightened of being accused of “interfering”?

We may feel uneasy about how a child is being treated, but do we hesitate to do anything because we feel its really not our business?

Most of the time child protection agencies do a good job of looking after thousands of children.

I know this because I’ve worked with the Children’s Panel system in Scotland.

Social workers, teachers, foster parents and carers pick up the pieces and try to bring hope and safety into the lives of damaged children.

We owe them for their tireless dedication. But, tragically, sometimes mistakes are made.

Daniel failed to get the help he so desperately needed. Our society let him down.

I hope we learn from this case. I hope it makes us more vigilant.

Whether you work with children professionally or are a neighbour or family friend, don’t be afraid to voice your concerns.

A child’s life could depend on it.