Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Beth Warren’s victory to keep her dead husband’s sperm is a win for compassion

Post Thumbnail

The news that a young widow might still have the chance to bear her husband’s child was a victory for compassion and common sense.

A court has ruled that Beth Warren will be allowed to keep her dead husband’s sperm, which was to have been destroyed.

Beth’s husband Warren (she took his first name as her married name) died of a brain tumour two years ago and the couple married in a hospice shortly before he passed away.

They had discussed having children and he had his sperm stored and frozen so that at least Beth had the choice of whether or not to go ahead and try to conceive.

She is still only 28 and has been grieving for her beloved husband while battling to ensure his sperm was not destroyed.

That would have happened this year after a two-year deadline under rules set by the UK fertility regulator.

The last thing poor Beth should have had to cope with was a legal fight.

She has had to come to terms with the death of the man she loved in horribly tough circumstances and this extra stress and upset was deeply unfair.

There should be a better system in place and rules drawn up to protect couples in the same situation.

It is terrific that we have the scientific know-how to store sperm and create new life, but there must be no grey areas.

Clearly, Beth and her husband were in agreement she should try for children after his death if that was her wish.

The judge was critical of the clinic for not ensuring that all necessary long-term consent forms were in place.

Beth’s husband hadn’t actually signed on the dotted line, which wasn’t his fault, as surely those in charge should take responsibility for ensuring all is in order when a patient is at death’s door.

If they had, it would have saved a great deal of anguish.

Beth said she was elated by the decision as it now gives her back the choice of whether or not to have her late husband’s baby.

She doesn’t know what the future holds, she might meet someone else or decide that life would be too tough as a single mum, but at least it is now her decision to make.

Hopefully, Beth’s battle will have ensured that no one else will have to endure this extra heartache on top of losing the love of their life.