Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Sir Kenny Dalglish: We’re out of the courtroom and back on the pitch, and now it’s time to move on

© SNS GroupNeil Doncaster was accused of being smug after the SFA arbitration panel ruled in the SPFL’s favour
Neil Doncaster was accused of being smug after the SFA arbitration panel ruled in the SPFL’s favour

It’s been the norm in Scottish football in recent months for there to be some sort of spat between the SPFL hierarchy and some of their member clubs.

For journalists, headline writers, radio phone-ins and football debate shows, there’s been plenty to talk about and argue over.

Due to the vote to end the season early, Hearts, Partick Thistle and Stranraer were relegated.

They felt that was grossly unfair, and went against everything the game stood for.

I could absolutely see their point.

They took it all the way to court, and last Monday, the arbitration panel delivered their verdict.

They deemed that Neil Doncaster and the SPFL executive committee had acted appropriately in their dealings with the situation.

Doncaster immediately released a statement, saying that he felt vindicated.

Craig Levein, sacked by Hearts last October from his position as director of football, felt that the SPFL chief executive was gloating.

He believed Doncaster should have been more respectful to the unfortunate situation that the Jambos, and the other relegated clubs, found themselves in.

Craig is entitled to his opinion.

I watched Doncaster give an interview in the Sky studios, and I didn’t think that he came across in an untoward manner.

He basically said that he was pleased that the SPFL were satisfied with the decision.

Considering that there have been accusations and innuendo against Doncaster and some of his colleagues – not to mention several letters from various clubs, including Rangers – it is understandable there would be a feeling of satisfaction and relief.

The spotlight had been well and truly on the SPFL hierarchy for nearly five months, and no chief executive should be happy when that is the case.

I wrote in this column many times that I didn’t agree with some of the things that had gone on within the SPFL, and I stand by that.

Despite winning their case, it is clear improvements in their governance still need to be made.

I hope that some of the things that have been highlighted are addressed and corrected.

Things can’t be swept under the carpet.

That’s not to say it all needs to be done in public. It can be just as effective doing things quietly in the background to get the desired result.

Moving forward, I think we’d all like to see a line drawn under all of this, and now concentrate on the football.

We have all the makings of some exciting stuff in the Premiership this season, and we need to embrace that.

We also have a cracker of a Championship in prospect.

And as if we didn’t need any more talking points and controversy, the SPFL fixtures computer has thrown Hearts and Dundee together on the opening weekend of their season in October.

That raised a few eyebrows and has brought how the fixture list is actually compiled into the spotlight.

That was the case a couple of weeks ago when the first Old Firm game of the season was scheduled for the 11th round of the campaign, with the suspicion that was to give every chance of fans being present inside Celtic Park.

I’ve always been of the mind that a computer can only come up with supposed solutions, based on the information fed into it by a human being.

Certainly, in this instance, a human should be able to overrule the computer.

It’s different, I think, when it comes to relying on technology on the park.

For example, when Sheffield United were denied a goal at Aston Villa in the first fixture post-lockdown, that was down to a failure of an electronic system.

Bournemouth now feel that the point Villa gained meant they avoided relegation, and Eddie Howe’s men went down.

I sympathise with them, but I don’t think the legal route to tackle this is the way to go.

They have been relegated and that should stand.

Their focus should now be on getting straight back up to the top flight.

That has to be the case with Hearts, and Partick Thistle and Stranraer should also be concentrating on promotion.

It’s good we will now be judging things from what happens on the park, and not what happens in the courtrooms.