Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

UK Government urged to publish outstanding contracts amid ‘corruption’ accusation

Post Thumbnail

The Government has been urged to publish outstanding Covid contracts by the end of the week after being accused of “corruption”.

Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Rachel Reeves called on ministers to publish the 100 outstanding contracts by Friday as Labour former minister Chris Bryant said he suspected wrongdoing in the awarding of agreements during the pandemic.

But Health Minister Edward Argar dismissed Mr Bryant’s accusation, adding: “I do not recognise his characterisation of what happened.”

Asking an urgent question on the matter, Ms Reeves told the Commons: “The Good Law Project took the Government to court and on February 19, the High Court ruled that the Government had acted unlawfully, saying, and I quote: ‘The public were entitled to see who this money was going to and what it was being spent on and how the contracts were awarded.’

“Three days later, on February 22 in this House, the Prime Minister said, and I quote again: ‘The contracts are there on the record for everybody to see.’ But they’re not. A judge confirmed through a court order last Friday that 100 contracts are still to be published.

“So will (health minister Edward Argar) now take this opportunity to apologise for that statement and to put the record straight?

“And will the Government now finally agree to publish all 100 outstanding contracts by the end of this week?”

Mr Argar responded: “(Ms Reeves) asked a particular question and I hope she will allow me to answer that where she referred to (the Prime Minister) and his comments, I think, on February 22, if I’m correct in surmising from her.

“(The Prime Minister) was responding to a question around the failure to publish the details of specific contracts which are subject to judicial reviews. At the time of his statement, the details for all of these contracts under scrutiny, I’m advised, were published.”

Labour’s Debbie Abrahams (Oldham East and Saddleworth) later called on the Prime Minister to deliver a “fulsome apology” to MPs for making a “factually untrue” statement.

Mr Argar replied: “On the date the Prime Minister spoke, as I understand it, 100% of the contract awards notices – the details of the contracts which are contained within them – were published. And that, I believe, was what (the Prime Minister) was referring to.”

Mr Bryant told the Commons: “The truth of the matter is that the Government didn’t even get PPE out fast enough to people who really needed it, especially in our care homes, which is why so many people died and we have the highest excess death rate of any country in the world.

“So I’m not taking any of this nonsense about they had to focus on that which meant that they couldn’t deal with transparency. The truth is what they set up was a VIP track for some people to be able to get massive contracts, and some people enriched themselves phenomenally during this pandemic.

“And many of them – surprise, surprise – happen to be Conservative party donors.

“It looks, I have to say, like corruption, and the only way that the Government can wipe that slate clean is if it comes clean with all the contracts, because otherwise it just looks like a cover-up.”

Mr Argar responded: “I’ll take his first comment, I think, as a compliment from a colleague I know well. But I have to say, having said that, I do not recognise his characterisation of what happened.

“He is right that there were challenges faced, not just in front line and NHS situations, but in social care, he’s absolutely right to highlight that, as I alluded to earlier.”