Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Nicola Sturgeon: “My heart breaks for the family of Paige Doherty”

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon (Jane Barlow/PA Wire)
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon (Jane Barlow/PA Wire)

FIRST MINISTER Nicola Sturgeon has told how her “heart breaks” for the family of murdered schoolgirl Paige Doherty after her killer had his sentence cut by four years.

John Leathem was given a mandatory life sentence and ordered to spend at least 27 years behind bars for the frenzied knife attack on the 15-year-old.

Leathem admitted killing the teenager after she came into his deli-shop in Clydebank, West Dunbartonshire, in March 2016.

Last week, less than a year after Paige’s death, judges at the Appeal Court in Edinburgh quashed the original punishment and imposed a 23-year minimum sentence.

The First Minister said: “My heart breaks for the family of Paige Doherty.

“I met Paige’s mother last year and there literally are no words to express the pain and grief that she and the rest of her family have gone through.”

She said she had “no difficulty” understanding comments made by the Justice for Paige campaign group, who branded the reduction in Leathem’s sentence as “heartbreaking”, arguing that it “serves no justice to Paige and her family”

Ms Sturgeon said: “If I had been a relative of Paige Doherty, I would have felt exactly the same.”

In what she said were “absolutely frank” comments, the SNP leader added: “As well as being First Minister, I’m also a human being and there are many occasions when I look at decisions of courts and wish that different decisions had been reached. It may well be this is one such case.”

She stressed: “This was the decision of an independent judge in a court of law. We have an independent judiciary in this country.”

The decision prompted Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson to call for whole-life sentences to be introduced north of the border.

She challenged Ms Sturgeon on the issue at First Minister’s Questions at Holyrood, saying if the Scottish Government did not act her party would bring forward a member’s bill to try to make the change.

Ms Davidson said: “As it stands, our judges do not have the tool of a whole-life tariff at their disposal and we say that we should.

“We can sit in this Parliament and we can wring our hands and we can express outrage every time something like this happens, or we can do something about it.

“I want to do something about it.”

She pledged: “If the Scottish Government won’t act, then I can say the Scottish Conservatives will do so by pushing ahead with a member’s bill making the case for the introduction of whole-life sentencing in Scotland.

“We need to stand up for families who see sentences for murder cut less than a year after they have been handed down and we should change the law so that families like Paige Doherty’s feel that the law is tipping back in their favour and that the worst criminals are kept off our streets forever.”

 

“The problem here isn’t just the Paige Doherty case, there are too many families who have seen their loved ones killed who do not feel they are getting the justice they deserve, who feel that the dice is loaded against them and in favour of the criminals.

“We have long campaigned for whole-life sentences to be introduced in Scotland so that judges could, if they wish, sentence the very worst criminals to spend the rest of their lives in jail.”

Ms Sturgeon said the Government would consider if change was needed but stressed that the independence of the judiciary meant there would always be some cases where sentencing decisions come in for criticism.

The First Minister added: “No matter what framework and context Parliament sets on any of these issues, we will still have instances where decisions by courts are decisions that many people feel are the wrong decisions. That’s in the very nature of an independent judiciary.

“But I am very clear that where there is evidence the law has to be changed or action has to be taken, then that is something this Government and this Parliament should reflect on very seriously.

“That includes the experience of the particular tragic case we are talking about today.”