Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fewer that one in five think social media is good at separating fact from fiction

Post Thumbnail

FEWER than one in five people in the UK thinks social media does a good job in separating fact from fiction, a major study has revealed.

That is less than half the figure that thinks the traditional news media does well in that regard, according to the Reuters Institute annual Digital News Review.

The report was based on a survey of 70,000 people in 38 countries and other keys findings included:

  • More under-35s than originally thought were prepared to pay for digital news.
  • Almost one in three respondents said they actively avoided the news, with almost half of those saying it was depressing.
  • In the UK, overall trust in news organisations has dropped 7% post-Brexit, with the reason believed to be the polarised sides in the debate both believing the media had fed them fake news.

Globally, only 24% of people think social media does a good job in separating fact from fiction. That dropped to 18% in the UK.

That was compared to a global figure of 40% who thought news media did a good job in that regard, with the UK scoring 41%.

Only people in Greece reported more confidence in social media, with 28% saying it did a good job compared with 19% for news organisations.

The public’s concerns about fake news should embolden publishers to champion distinctive, high-quality journalism, lead author Nic Newman said.

And media organisations should be encouraged by a finding that, contrary to what has traditionally been thought, under-35s were prepared to pay for news.

That correlated with this age group already being well-used to buying online services such as Netflix or Spotify.

In the post-Trump US, the figure of people willing to pay for online news has gone up from 9% to 16%, with most of those coming from the political left.

The survey also revealed that ad-blocking, though still widespread, has stopped growing and has largely not spread to mobile devices.

Mr Newman said media organisations should be more optimistic about this year’s review than the previous one.

It was a “myth” young people would not pay for news, he said, and there were emerging new business models and a growth in donations and memberships schemes.

“The worries that people have about the quality of their news means there is an opportunity to charge, or to cut through with more distinctive journalism,” he said.

“People are beginning to realise if you don’t pay for it then you are the product.”