Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Gordon Smith: Will others follow Rangers to England and abroad?

Billy Gilmour in action for Rangers (SNS)
Billy Gilmour in action for Rangers (SNS)

RANGERS move to leave the Development League next season in favour of a programme of glamour friendlies is hugely interesting news.

I know for a fact their Head of Academy Craig Mulholland has been working hard to make changes to the youth structure at the club.

He has been doing so in response to a belief that not enough first-team players were being produced for the Light Blues through the system currently in place.

Challenging kids by giving them matches against the likes of Bayern Munich, Benfica, Manchester United, Spurs and Southampton is a brand-new initiative.

To try it out in a pilot scheme makes sense for Rangers and, the dual blessing of the SFA and the SPFL would suggest, for the country too.

Logic says that playing against the best of Bayern’s or Spurs’ kids should be better preparation for an international career than those from a Scottish provincial club, however well run.

Mulholland has spoken of the great success achieved by Spurs and Southampton through challenging their young players early, and of wanting to adopt similar practices at Rangers.

That makes sense – but how many other Scottish clubs will want to follow suit and how many will be able to? Sending youth teams to play in England and abroad is an expensive business. Travel and accommodation costs mount up very quickly.

Rangers, of course, can afford to speculate to accumulate. The sale of Billy Gilmour to Chelsea, reluctant though it was, is expected to raise some £600,000.

That’s a lot of money for a kid who has only got as far as training with the first team and, as such, a real feather in the Academy’s cap.

And while the Light Blues were clear in stating that, in this particular case, they would rather have the player than the money, it underlines the existence of a lucrative market available to Scottish clubs.

Celtic, who ran a team in the NextGen series, taking on the likes of Barcelona and Manchester City, could well be keen to join their city rivals.

Brendan Rodgers is a big advocate of giving youth its chance and gave starts to two good kids – Michael Johnston and Anthony Ralston – against St Johnstone last weekend.

However, whether the likes of Aberdeen, Hearts and Hibs would see it as money well spent is another question.

I should state here I am not a fan of the Development Leagues and told Mark Wotte, the former SFA Performance Director, as much.

In the end we had to agree to disagree.

For me, the key age group is 15 to 18 years old. That is when we see who is developing into a first-team player – 19 to 20 years old is too late.

If they have not broken through by then, either they are not good enough or something has gone wrong along the line.

I made my own breakthrough at Kilmarnock at the age of 17 and stayed in the side from there on in.

The fact I was able to hold my own in the men’s game was down to the grounding I had received playing against senior pros in reserve league football.

Now, as then, I believe it is the best environment in which to develop our young talent – for the majority of our clubs anyway.

Rangers may prove that for the very top teams, diversity is the best option. Time will tell.

If nothing else, the push to try something genuinely innovative is to be applauded.