Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Gordon Smith: Artificial surfaces aren’t pitch perfect, but they are the future

Rugby Park’s artificial pitch has come in for criticism (SNS Group / Alan Harvey)
Rugby Park’s artificial pitch has come in for criticism (SNS Group / Alan Harvey)

THE deluge of criticism aimed at artificial pitches over the past week has been over the top.

I believe they are improving – and that they are the way forward.

Yes, there have been injuries suffered on them, with Jamie Murphy’s very unfortunate long-term lay-off the latest example.

But I saw a lot of injuries in my years as a player – and they were all on grass.

Just to actually say that Murphy’s problems were caused by the Rugby Park pitch is wrong.

Two of our top centre-halves in Scotland – Christophe Berra and Scott McKenna – are out just now, and their injuries were sustained at Tynecastle and Pittodrie, which are two natural grass surfaces.

I know there are different types of artificial pitches, and some will be better than others.

But you see an awful lot of amateur football played on them, and I contend they are much better for the standard of passing and dribbling.

I recently went to see my little grandson play in a game on grass, and the surface was a disgrace.

Even at this time of the year.

That can be different for the professional game, where clubs have better grass. But even at that, we have seen how the pitches deteriorate quite quickly.

If anyone asks me whether I prefer grass or astroturf, I generally say grass.

But that is in August and September because, after that, the grass pitches quickly get worse.

There have been many cases in Scotland where the pitch has become dramatically worse, in particular after undersoil heating has been deployed and damage has been done to the roots.

In recent years, we have seen it at Pittodrie and Fir Park. Even Rugby Park – before they laid the astro – was poor and that generally is the case.

In England, they have a lot of money and can develop their pitches very well at the highest level because they are willing to spend a lot.

You only need to look at Celtic for an example closer to home.

Their new pitch looks great – but cost them some £1.8m.

Like a lot of the top pitches down south, Celtic Prek is a hybrid, in that it is mostly grass but has a small percentage of artificial to make it more hard-wearing.

Probably no other club up here can afford to do that.

We need to look at the fact that many other countries have artificial surfaces, and study which ones have the fewest problems.

UEFA or FIFA should be undertaking a wide-ranging study into the subject, from which they could use the results to dictate a minimum standard for all pitches that are laid down.

Specifically, I believe they should make it compulsory that every installation should have the appropriate rubber shock pad laid beneath the surface for the professional game in order to protect players.

What is underneath matters as much as the surface itself.

Then every club that wants to put an astroturf pitch down would have to comply, and we would have a parity across the board rather than the current set-up where they can vary quite significantly, especially in terms of the amount of give.

Let’s be honest, there is money to be made by clubs with artificial surfaces. They allow them to use their stadium and the pitch as an income generator because you can then let it out to local sides.

If it is a grass pitch, you can’t really do that because of the damage that can be done.

You only have to look at the mess that was made of Hampden a couple of years back when there was bad weather and two or three big concerts in a short space of time.

So, in summary, I think astroturf is the way ahead.

More and more kids are growing up, who are going to be very used to playing on it and viewing it as the norm, the same way we used to view grass.

So I don’t believe there will be a problem.

I would be confident in artificial pitches for many years to come – provided a common standard is put in place.

If you can afford the very best of grass pitches, then fine.

And if the criticism of artificial pitches we’ve heard in the past week actually leads to improvements, it will have been worthwhile.