Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scottish rules on betting should be reviewed

Post Thumbnail

It was shocking to hear the news that Steve Simonsen has been charged with breaching SFA gambling rules.

The notice of complaint from the Association alleges he placed bets on 55 matches over the past 12 months.

There is no suggestion, they have pointed out, he was involved in any of the matches he is accused of putting money on.

The hearing is to be held on February 12 and Rangers have insisted they will continue playing the 35-year-old Englishman until then. He is, as they state, innocent until proven guilty.

That is fair enough. But if that is indeed the finding, fans will be entitled to ask some serious questions. Because given the amount of publicity recent cases have had, it would be naive in the extreme for any Scottish player to be indulging in such behaviour.

It would be frankly staggering for the culprit to come from Rangers.

It was in September, 2013, remember, that Ian Black was handed a 10-game ban, seven of which were suspended, plus a £7,500 fine for placing 160 football bets over seven years.

To say this was a high-profile case would be an understatement.

Given Black is a current team-mate of Simonsen, he would have to know both all about the offence in question, and the potential penalties.

There is, of course, a big difference with Black. Three of the games involved his clubs at the time. And this leads us on to a separate issue.

Yes, it is essential professional footballers should follow the rules and regulations. They are there for a reason.

At the same time, why shouldn’t someone who is playing his football with Rangers in the Scottish Championship not be able to bet a couple of pounds on a match between, say my old club Brighton and Arsenal today?

Provided he can’t influence the outcome, then where is the harm?

I know this issue grates on a lot of people involved in the game.

Betting is part of Scottish culture and football players themselves are almost by definition likely to have an interest in the big matches.

What is especially annoying is that people in the game in England are free to bet provided it is outwith their own country.

For me, that makes perfect sense.

In fact, I would go as far as to say the Scottish rules should be reviewed with a view to being changed.

I do appreciate gambling can be a big problem for players. There have been some real cases of woe.

But the Players Union works hard to educate footballers on the potential pitfalls and warnings are posted in every bookmaker.

They are adults and, as such, should be entitled to make their own choices.