Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Sir Alex should have prepared his own successor

Post Thumbnail

David Moyes’ sacking by Manchester United was no great shock to me.

In fact, it confirmed my belief that football management is most definitely not an exact science. The chemistry between a manager and his players is critical to success.

Most of those who have been discussing Moyes’ exit seem to believe a certain degree of training and experience should lead to guaranteed success in a football management position. The reality is no-one has any idea of who is going to be successful.

Who could have been a better judge in selecting the next boss for the club than one of the world’s most-experienced and successful managers, Sir Alex Ferguson?

Sir Alex advised United’s owners Moyes was the correct choice as his successor, based on his first-class record with Preston and Everton. He would also have had inside information on his coaching methods and managerial style.

If Sir Alex can get it so wrong, then it proves the point that every football managerial appointment is both total guesswork, and a massive risk.

When they make the appointment and it works out well, the directors and Chief Executive generally take the plaudits but actually it is pure luck.

The whole farce that emerged at United proves conclusively that football management is an illogical profession, with often conflicting chemical elements.

We have seen many examples over the years where a new manager comes in and has an immediate response from the same group of players blamed for the previous manager’s failure.

The simple solution has been that the players have responded positively to the tactics employed by new boss, team selections and man-management.

It just happens to fit in with this group of players, and not necessarily because the new boss is better than the previous incumbent.

David Moyes was able to work in a certain way with Everton over many years and use his own methods.

Manchester United is a totally different set-up, and the players he inherited had different skills, ambitions and experiences. Not to mention different egos!

It just didn’t work for Moyes, and I’m sure that looking back Sir Alex might regret that he didn’t prepare his own successor in-house. That could have been managed over a number of years, and would have resulted in far less adjustment being required by everyone involved at Old Trafford.

Moyes should certainly not now be regarded as a bad manager.

Hopefully, he’ll have learned greatly from this experience and realised how this football chemistry can work for you and against you.