Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Glazers’ Man Utd sale plans a sign that Premier League has hit maximum value

The Glazer family’s decision to put Manchester United up for sale is a sign of changing dynamics in Premier League economics, an expert has said (Ian Hodgson/PA)
The Glazer family’s decision to put Manchester United up for sale is a sign of changing dynamics in Premier League economics, an expert has said (Ian Hodgson/PA)

Football finance expert Kieran Maguire believes the Glazer family’s decision to consider selling Manchester United could be a sign that some of the Premier League’s wealthy owners feel they have extracted as much value as they can from the competition.

Todd Boehly’s £2.5billion takeover of Chelsea turned heads and the Premier League’s two biggest brands – United and Liverpool – are now up for sale after Anfield owners Fenway Sports Group made a similar announcement earlier this month.

Maguire, author of The Price of Football, told the PA news agency a number of factors were at work, but the failure of attempts by bigger clubs to exert more control over the game and the growing competition for Champions League places has persuaded some owners now could be the time to get out.

“Could it be said we’re at maximum Premier League?” Maguire said. “That’s in the sense that what owners were hoping to extract through the European Super League and also by taking control of the domestic game under Project Big Picture is no longer there.

“As a consequence they don’t see any opportunity to further monetise their brand. That’s a horrible term, but the Glazers or (Liverpool principal owner) John Henry don’t care if their club wins, loses or draws, their focus is purely on the bottom line.

“I think (Chelsea) was very much the catalyst and there are other Premier League clubs who are quietly up for sale. Everybody has taken a huge interest in what has happened in the last 12 months.

“Newcastle has caused a further ripple because six-into-four doesn’t go in terms of Champions League places and seven-into-four makes it even more challenging.

Liverpool v Wolverhampton Wanderers – Premier League – Anfield
The Fenway Sports Group, led by John W. Henry, have also offered Liverpool for sale (Peter Byrne/PA)

“Is there a case for the United and Liverpool owners thinking ‘if those are the circumstances under which we’re operating, it’s time to get out and give somebody else those problems?’”

Maguire said that, measured against Chelsea’s revenues and profitability, a fair price for United would be up to £4.5bn but that an even higher price should be expected.

“It’s a bit like buying the Mona Lisa,” he said. “There’s only one in the world and people are prepared to pay a premium.”

But Maguire warned any incoming owner there would be no easy fix at a club who have not won the Premier League since the retirement of Sir Alex Ferguson in 2013, and who have fallen behind in terms of investment off the pitch.

“Anybody that comes in should not be looking for a quick turnaround,” he said. “It is a long-term project.

Manchester United v Newcastle United – Premier League – Old Trafford
Old Trafford is in need of major investment (Martin Rickett/PA)

“In respect of putting money into the stadium it is going to be an architectural challenge. We’re probably talking about £200-300million, which in the context of a £4-5bn acquisition perhaps isn’t that much.”

Maguire also added a note of caution for the United fans who have long campaigned to get the Glazers out.

“Change isn’t the same as improvement, that’s a common misconception,” he said. “If I was from Urmston or somewhere close to (Old Trafford) I think the choice would be Sir Jim Ratcliffe.

“He’s a Manchester lad, he understands the culture of Manchester. It would be a very romantic return, but whether he’s willing to pay the prices being quoted I’m not so sure. He’s a very smart businessman.

“One alternative would be the Middle East. United fans have been more than happy to throw brickbats at Newcastle and Manchester City in respect of Middle Eastern owners, so would their reaction change if someone effectively came along with a sugar daddy approach?

“The third alternative would be another set of US owners, but they would be looking for a financial return rather than an emotional return, which would perhaps mean you don’t see the huge sums fans want to see spent.”