Firms will face hefty fines unless they meet requirements showing their supply chains are free from forced labour under measures aimed at tackling human rights abuses in Xinjiang, China.
Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said companies will be given robust guidance on how to carry out due diligence checks to make sure they are not sourcing products tainted by the human rights violations in the province.
The Beijing government has been accused of widespread abuse in Xinjiang, mainly targeted at the Uighur minority group, including allegations of forced sterilisation, slave labour and mass internment.
Members of the Uighur minority group have reportedly been made to pick cotton in Xinjiang province, leading to concerns British consumers could inadvertently be buying tainted goods.
Mr Raab told the Commons the picture of human rights abuses in Xinjiang was “harrowing” and the UK had a “moral duty to respond”.
He said: “Internment camps, arbitrary detention, political re-education, forced labour, torture and forced sterilisation – all on an industrial scale.
“It is truly horrific. Barbarism we had hoped lost to another era, being practiced today as we speak in one of the leading members of the international community.”
Under the Modern Slavery Act, firms with a turnover of more than £36 million must publish statements setting out what action they have taken to ensure there is no slavery in their supply chains.
That will now be backed up by the threat of heavy fines for companies which fail to comply, with details to be set out later.
Lucrative Government contracts will only go to firms which adhere to their obligations in ensuring their supply chains are free from Xinjiang links.
There will also be a review of export controls to prevent UK firms supplying products to the Xinjiang camps.
Mr Raab said: “Here in the UK we must take action to make sure that UK businesses are not part of the supply chains that lead to the gates of the internment camps in Xinjiang.
“And to make sure that the products of the human rights violations that take place in those camps don’t end up on the shelves of supermarkets that we shop in here at home, week in and week out.”
With Beijing denying the allegations of abuse, Mr Raab said the Chinese government should allow an independent and authoritative investigation of the situation in Xinjiang.
The measures announced by the Foreign Secretary were criticised for not going far enough, with calls in the Commons for the UK to impose direct sanctions on the officials responsible for the Xinjiang abuses.
Shadow foreign secretary Lisa Nandy said: “The strength of his (Mr Raab’s) words are once again not matched by the strength of his actions and I am sorry to say that will be noticed loud and clear in Beijing.”
Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith claimed Mr Raab was being prevented from imposing so-called Magnitsky sanctions on human rights abusers by ministerial colleagues.
“Surely Magnitsky sanctions should have been in this list,” Sir Iain said, adding: “I wonder who it is in Government that is blocking this.”
Mr Raab said sanctions were “certainly not ruled out” but the measures he had announced were “more targeted and forensic”.
Enjoy the convenience of having The Sunday Post delivered as a digital ePaper straight to your smartphone, tablet or computer.
Subscribe for only £5.49 a month and enjoy all the benefits of the printed paper as a digital replica.Subscribe