Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

MEPs face row over allowances secrecy

Post Thumbnail

British MEPs have come under fire after voting against a move to reveal how they spend their taxpayer-funded allowances.

A controversial meeting of the European Parliament saw the UK’s representatives vote by a margin of more than 10 to one against publishing how staff, office and travel allowances worth more than £220 million a year are spent.

Only five MEPs two Greens, two SNP and one from Plaid Cymru supported the greater scrutiny during the vote.

Moves to force MEPs to account for where they spend a £38,000-a-year general expenditure allowance, which is paid without any need for proof of expenditure, were also blocked.

SNP MEP Alyn Smith, who was one of only 74 MEPs to vote for the full transparency, said: “The Scottish Parliament is a globally-recognised leader in transparency and the European Parliament is manifestly not.

“This needs to change.”

Conservative, Labour, Ukip and Liberal Democrat groups who represent 64 British MEPs voted to overturn a proposal demanding ‘an end-of-year public report’ on their use of allowances which are worth an average of around £300,000 each.

But a spokesman for Labour’s MEPs blamed horse-trading on amendments for Wednesday’s vote, insisting his party is in favour of increased transparency.

He said: “We support the stronger rules proposed last week and should have been allowed by the parliament authorities to vote for them.

“But had the alternative proposals not gone through we’d have been left with nothing at all, which would have done nothing to improve accountability.”

Meanwhile a Tory spokesman said: “We voted to apply genuine pressure for greater transparency instead of voting for proposals that had no chance of being adopted.”

Last week, MEPs awarded themselves an extra £13,000 a year in allowances for assistants, despite concerns the funding worth £142m a year is being abused.

MEPs are also paid a daily “subsistence allowance” worth £220 in cash a day without having to prove how they spent the money.

Pawel Swidlicki, of the Open Europe think-tank, told The Times that MEPs were “exhibiting a lack of sensitivity to public opinion, specifically when it comes to their own behaviour”.

He added: “Ukip’s self-serving stance is not surprising, it is hugely disappointing that the Tory, Labour and Lib Dem MEPs closed ranks to vote against greater expenses transparency.

“It is not consistent to talk up the need for EU reform at home but then obstruct it within the European parliament.”