Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Families ‘will still face enormous challenges in making ends meet’

Families will still face enormous challenges in making ends meet, despite the support package unveiled to combat the cost-of-living crisis, according to money experts (Anthony Devlin/PA)
Families will still face enormous challenges in making ends meet, despite the support package unveiled to combat the cost-of-living crisis, according to money experts (Anthony Devlin/PA)

Families will still face enormous challenges in making ends meet, despite the support package unveiled to combat the cost-of-living crisis, according to money experts.

Charities also said Chancellor Rishi Sunak is “kidding himself” if he believes the problem is temporary, as calls were made for longer term changes to the social security system.

The Chancellor’s package of targeted Government support unveiled on Thursday includes a £650 payment to more than eight million low-income households on Universal Credit, Tax Credits, Pension Credit and legacy benefits, with separate one-off payments of £300 to pensioner households and £150 to people receiving disability benefits. These groups are among the most vulnerable to rising prices.

Households will also receive a £400 discount on their energy bills from October.

Sarah Coles, senior personal finance analyst, Hargreaves Lansdown said: “Unfortunately the sheer scale of energy price rises mean that despite the support announced today, a huge number of families will still face enormous challenges in making ends meet.”

She added: “What’s more, by waiting until October to provide the energy grant, there’s a real risk that people’s financial resilience will be completely exhausted by then.”

The Resolution Foundation think tank highlighted risks that families who come into the benefit system after cut-off dates for measuring eligibility – for example if they lose their job – may miss out.

It said some groups will do better from lump sum payments than others, as flat payments do not reflect different levels of need within the benefit system or different levels of energy usage.

The biggest group to lose out from the approach of lump sum payments versus benefits uprating are families with children, with large families facing the greatest risks of severe fuel stress this winter, the Foundation said.

Torsten Bell, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, said: “The decision to provide one-off payments this year to poorer households, pensioners and those with a disability is a good attempt to target those with higher energy bills – although the relative lack of support for larger families stands out.

“The Chancellor’s commitment to uprate benefits next April in line with very high inflation also offers important security for lower income households that their living standards will be protected from surging prices tomorrow as well as today.”

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) also said there was a “crudeness” to the measures, with the flat rate amounts applying in full to those entitled to very little in benefits, and yet not at all to those whose income was very slightly too high to be entitled, meaning significant inequity in the treatment of very similar families.

The state pensions triple-lock would also be reinstated.

The triple-lock guarantees that pensions grow in line with whichever is highest out of earnings, inflation or 2.5%, but the earnings element was temporarily suspended for 2022/23 due to the distorting impact of the coronavirus crisis on wages.

Helen Morrissey, senior pensions and retirement analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown said: “The Chancellor did confirm the pension triple-lock would be back next year and added if inflation remains high then pensioners will receive a further boost, but… that is not until next April and many pensioners will need to battle through a winter where their costs will likely soar.”

Steven Cameron, pensions director at Aegon said: “The state pension increased in April by only 3.1%, after the triple-lock formula was amended, far below inflation which is now running at 9%.

“Had the state pension been increased by this amount, someone entitled to the full rate would have been receiving a weekly state pension of £195.75 a week, £10.60 above the actual level of £185.15. This leaves an individual’s purchasing power £551.20 a year less.”

Mr Cameron said the “good news” is that payments being made to the poorest pensioner households “will more than compensate for this”.

Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK said many poorer pensioners are currently missing out on Pension Credit, adding: “We know that some three-quarters of a million are missing out at the moment, so we urge anyone who thinks they may be eligible to put in a claim without delay.”

Christians Against Poverty’s director of external affairs, Gareth McNab, said the charity is dealing with some households with much higher deficits than the amount of support offered in the package, adding: “The simple truth is that while more generous, even these payments will fail to keep many out of destitution.”

Imran Hussain, director of policy and campaigns at Action for Children, said: “The measures announced today will help, but won’t fully shield families with children from the pain they’re experiencing.

“With more mouths to feed, more rooms to heat and more clothes to wash, families with children feel price rises the most and are at greatest risk of falling into poverty.

“Ultimately, we need a stronger social security system to ensure all families with children can meet their basic needs.”

Alison Garnham, chief executive of Child Poverty Action Group said: “The Chancellor is kidding himself if he thinks that the problem is temporary or that the package he offered today will stop people finding themselves so far back that they never recover.”

Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: “We need a windfall tax on all those who have profited while people have suffered, not just energy firms.”