Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Sub-postmaster ‘blamed staff’ for Horizon IT system shortfalls

Former sub-postmaster John Gormley gives evidence to the inquiry in Belfast (POHITI/PA)
Former sub-postmaster John Gormley gives evidence to the inquiry in Belfast (POHITI/PA)

The Post Office must not be allowed to get away with ruining the lives of hundreds of wrongly accused postmasters across the UK, an inquiry has heard.

Former sub-postmaster John Gormley, from Co Londonderry, said there are serious questions to be asked after a faulty IT system saw workers having to use their own money to balance the accounts every week.

Fiona Elliott, a former sub-postmistress in Co Tyrone, said she wants those responsible to be accountable and for prompt compensation.

“We’ve been waiting about now for 10 to 15 years, they were quick enough to take all our money, and now they won’t pay us back for what we’ve lost,” she told the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry sitting in Belfast.

Post Office Inquiry
Former Post Office worker Fiona Elliott at the Clayton Hotel in Belfast (Brian Lawless/PA)

“I hope that the Post Office finally takes responsibility for their actions and apologises. I also want accountability for their actions. I would like Post Office to compensate fairly and promptly the people whose lives and businesses have been ruined.”

Mr Gormley was sub-postmaster of a Post Office in the Shantallow area of Londonderry from 2002 to 2008.

He described being told to “make good” on discrepancies thrown up by the Post Office IT system Horizon every week of around £60-80.

“As time went on the pressure started to grow, I was getting pretty worried, there was weeks it could have been £100, there was weeks it could have been down to £30 short, very few weeks it was break even, and I rarely saw a plus,” he told the inquiry sitting at the Clayton Hotel in Belfast on Thursday.

He described a “strained” relationship with staff in the Post Office due to the shortages.

He said it only started to register with him when he saw media coverage in recent years of issues with Horizon.

“I blamed my staff and went into a situation where the business in the store started to go down big time because the blame game was being put on the staff in relation to shortages, but I always made good every week,” he said.

“We were in a very volatile place and I had to use measured words in a big way. I had to protect staff but at the same time the business was going down, the supplier was owed a fortune, we weren’t able to meet our direct debits.”

In 2008 Mr Gormley resigned as postmaster, describing being in “deep, deep issues”. He estimates he paid £20,000 attempting to balance the Horizon system.

“I was well down by that stage, I didn’t want to express my depression… my wife was feeling the pressure, it was affecting our marriage, we didn’t know at one stage whether we were going to have a loaf of bread for the end of the week next week,” he said.

Mr Gormley said he did not apply for compensation when a fund opened because he wanted to get the situation off his mind and did not want his family or friends to know about his problems, but he is now pursuing it.

“I find it hard to believe that this could happen, that an organisation like Royal Mail can get away with what they have got away with,” he told the inquiry.

“I can’t understand how it got so far, or where was the Government at this stage, were they not aware of it? Who was overseeing this?

“There are serious questions to be asked.”

Ms Elliott bought into a Post Office in 2005 because her and her husband felt it would be a good investment to provide for their retirement.

She told the inquiry they initially blamed the internet connection for the issues with Horizon, and asked for support repeatedly to probe the shortfalls.

Ms Elliott said she was making good on underpayments of £60-80 a week, sometimes going up to £200-300 a week, before she was told following an audit that there was now a £6,000 shortfall.

“We don’t know where it came out of because we had rolled over the night before, we made everything right. This £6,000 just appeared in the system and we don’t know where it came from,” she told the inquiry.

She was told to pay the £6,000 or face criminal proceedings, and had to borrow cash from her brother’s business because the Post Office officials said they would not wait for her bank to open following the lunch hour.

Ms Elliott has applied for compensation from the historic shortfall scheme, working out a figure with her accountant of £1 million to take into account lost wages, lost retail sales and having two houses repossessed.

She was offered £24,000, which she described being “disgusted by”.

“We lost the shop business, we lost the two properties, financially it was terrible. Now my husband and I are both back working full time whereas we should be getting ready for retirement,” she said.

The Post Office Horizon IT inquiry, which has been sitting across the UK, sat in Belfast on Wednesday and Thursday.

Inquiry chairman Sir Wyn Williams emphasised it is important for people to come forward and speak about how the experience impacted on their lives.