Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Half of all MoT fails could be wrong

Post Thumbnail

MOT testers are regularly failing cars that are perfectly roadworthy, a shock probe has found.

Around 28 million vehicles a year go in to UK garages for annual inspections. Around a third of them fail the tests carried out by licensed mechanics, meaning the car is uninsured and illegal to drive.

Unhappy motorists who think their MoT result is wrong can appeal the decision through the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency.

However, astonishing new statistics from the government body show that over the past five years 48% of those appeals were upheld. In other words, almost half of the MoT failures investigated should have been passed.

Motoring groups last night branded the findings “worrying”.

Hugh Bladon, of the Association of British Drivers, said: “It’s incredible to think almost one in two MoT failures could be wrong. How many others are in this position but haven’t been referred to VOSA? The mind boggles.

“It makes you wonder what is going on in the garages that have failed them. Are they incompetent or worse, corrupt?

“It is always at the back of drivers’ minds that they could be going to a rogue garage. Are their intentions about profits or doing the best for their customer?

“It’s perhaps time to look at who is carrying out MoT tests. I’d like to see a non-profit making independent body established to carry out all tests.”

Motorists can ask VOSA to intervene in MoT results within 14 days of the original decision. Drivers have to stump up the cost for another test but will have it refunded if successful.

Neil Greig, Director of Policy and Research at the Institute of Advanced Motorists, said: “There is already a lack of confidence in the garage trade and this doesn’t help. These figures shows there are issues in some garages.

“With cars so complex these days we rely on garages being trustworthy.”

Since 2009, VOSA has been asked to look at 484 failed MoTs. Out of this total, 231 were subsequently passed.

Car expert and Sunday Post driving columnist Alasdair Suttie said: “Many garages do a great job and lots of motorists have a trusted relationship with them. However, there are always those who don’t provide the best service.

“It’s incredible that so many safe, roadworthy cars can be deemed MoT failures. “MoTs are supposed to give motorists confidence that all cars on the road are up to a high standard, but these statistics make a mockery of that.”

A spokesperson for The Retail Motor Industry Federation, the body that represents the automotive trade body in the UK, did not respond to our inquiries.

A Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency spokesperson said: “The figures quoted are extremely low in relation to the number of MoT tests conducted every year in Great Britain and are clearly not representative of the competence of more than 22,000 MoT garages. As can be seen from the small sample, around half of MoT appeals are upheld.”

In January 2012, the Department for Transport added several new mandatory test items to the MoT to comply with a revised European testing directive.

This followed an announcement of a crackdown on dodgy garages that miss life-threatening problems.