Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Ex-marine in fight with MoD after complaining about ‘noise-induced hearing loss’

A former Royal Marine is embroiled in a High Court damages fight with the Ministry of Defence after complaining about “noise-induced hearing loss” (Tim Ireland/PA)
A former Royal Marine is embroiled in a High Court damages fight with the Ministry of Defence after complaining about “noise-induced hearing loss” (Tim Ireland/PA)

A former Royal Marine is embroiled in a High Court damages fight with the Ministry of Defence after complaining about “noise-induced hearing loss”.

James Barry, 34, of Nottingham, has told a judge that his “hearing loss and tinnitus” were caused by his “exposure to noise during his service in the Royal Marines” between 2013 and 2017.

Lawyers representing the Ministry of Defence (MoD) have outlined “allegations of contributory negligence”.

Mr Justice Johnson is considering evidence at a High Court trial in London.

Harry Steinberg KC, who is leading Mr Barry’s legal team, outlined details of the claim in a written argument given to the judge.

He said Mr Barry had noticed a hearing problem after returning from an exercise in the United States in 2014.

“The claimant seeks damages for noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus caused by his exposure to noise during his service in the Royal Marines,” said Mr Steinberg.

“The claimant first noticed a problem with his hearing following his return from the Black Alligator Exercise in the United States which took place between August and October 2014 for a period of about two and a half months.”

He added: “The claimant describes exercises during basic training where hearing protection was not worn (and could not be worn) at all.”

Mr Steinberg said the MoD had “admitted primary liability”.

He said the judge would have to consider a number of “core issues”: whether, and to what extent, Mr Barry was “contributorily negligent”; the “ongoing effect” of the noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus; Mr Barry’s “likely career path and length of service” but for his “noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus”; and whether or not Mr Barry was “disabled”.

Mr Steinberg said the case gave rise to “some issues” relevant to other “noise-induced hearing loss” claims being pursued against the MoD.

“The claimant’s evidence is that he was provided with both foam ear plugs and  earmuffs,” he said.

“The defendant is critical of the claimant’s practice of not wearing a foam ear plug in his left ear beneath his personal role radio headset and of his failure to re-insert ear plugs, which routinely fell out.”

Lawyers representing Mr Barry said outside court that he was claiming about £1.5 million in total – and the MoD was arguing that the figure should be about £250,000.

Barrister Andrew Ward, who represented the MoD, told the judge in a written argument that Mr Barry had been medically discharged “for noise induced hearing loss”.

Mr Ward highlighted Mr Barry’s “practice” relating to the use of ear plugs.

He said “primary liability” was “admitted” but told the judge that the MoD “pursues the defence of contributory negligence”.

“The claimant’s usual practice during his service with the Royal Marines was not to wear yellow foam ear plugs in his left ear underneath his personal role radio,” said Mr Ward.

“The claimant’s practice was contrary to his training.”

Mr Ward added: “The claimant’s evidence is that his yellow foam ear plugs repeatedly fell out. If so, then he was also contributorily negligent in failing properly to insert them.”

He said Mr Barry had “worse hearing in his left ear than his right”, and went on: “The reality is that his unauthorised practice of failing to wear a yellow foam ear plug under his left ear when using his personal role radio has contributed to ‘the damage’ in terms of noise induced hearing loss and tinnitus.”

The hearing is due to end later this month.