Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Cash concerns over end-of-life treatments

Scottish Government health minister Shona Robison (Bob Douglas / DC Thomson)
Scottish Government health minister Shona Robison (Bob Douglas / DC Thomson)

A fund that pays for new drugs for those with rare conditions or approaching the end of their life was doubled to £80 million last year.

The decision was taken amid reports seriously-ill Scots were being denied treatments available to people south of the Border.

But now a string of cash-strapped NHS boards have questioned the affordability of handing expensive treatments to patients at death’s door.

In its submission to a Holyrood review of the “new medicines fund”, NHS Borders said targeting resources at drugs which treat rare conditions was fair.

But it added that it seemed “hard to justify” for end-of-life treatments.

It went on: “Why should treatment at this stage of life be prioritised above other life stages and why should different cost effectiveness thresholds apply?”

More than 1,000 people have received new treatments as a result of the new medicines fund – including many in the final stages of their lives.

It typically costs between £15 and £25,000 to treat dying patients even though the drugs they are given often only prolong their lives by a matter of weeks.

NHS Borders argued that there is limited evidence to show these treatments improve quality of life for those who are terminally ill.

It also raised concerns that patients at other stages in their treatment were being denied drugs “of proven effectiveness” because health chiefs had diverted so much money to those approaching the end of their life.

Similar concerns were raised by officials at NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GG&C) and NHS Lothian.

In its submission, NHS GG&C said: “In a finite healthcare budget, decisions that increase access to medicines with more marginal benefits impacts on ability to deliver other healthcare services.”

Meanwhile, NHS Lothian stated: “The public should be aware that NHS resources are finite, and it will be impossible to fund all new medicines and treatments without considering the impact on other patients.”

Britain’s use of effective new medicines for conditions such as cancer is just a tenth of other European countries.

But in 2014, the Scottish Medicines Consortium, which dictates what drugs should be used by the NHS, was given more flexibility in evaluating medicines for end-of-life patients and those with rare conditions.

In January Health Secretary Shona Robison announced an independent review of the way drugs are assessed for use on the NHS.

At the time she said: “Access to new medicines for rare or end-of-life conditions is an extremely complex issue.

“With new treatments coming to market all the time, it is important to take stock of the progress to date to continually assure ourselves that our systems for assessing and accessing new drugs are keeping pace and meeting the expectations of patients.”


READ MORE

Five Scottish health boards miss A&E target but improvements over year hailed

Former NHS boss fears his son developed cancer from football training on plastic pitches