Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

MPs warn of ‘serious risk’ of future PPI-style mis-selling scandals

(Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

THERE are “serious risks” of further mis-selling scandals erupting in the financial services industry and stronger action is needed to tackle problems with the culture of firms, MPs have warned.

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) also said it is a “failure of the system of regulation and redress” that claims management firms have made up to £5 billion from PPI (payment protection insurance) payouts. This is compensation that could – and should – have been paid to the victims of mis-selling, the report said.

It warned that the pension freedoms introduced last year which give people aged over 55 more choice over how to use their retirement pots could be a “potential trigger” for future mis-selling on a mass scale.

The committee also highlighted recent upswings in complaints about “packaged” accounts, where consumers generally pay a monthly fee in return for a bundle of products and services included with a current account, as a potential area for concern about mis-selling.

Claims management firms typically take around a quarter or a third of compensation payouts – but people can make a complaint to a firm themselves for free.

If they are still unhappy they can go to the free Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), which resolves disputes between consumers and financial firms – although the PAC raised concerns about the service’s backlog of cases.

Meg Hillier, chair of the PAC, said: “The widespread mis-selling of PPI is a vivid demonstration of the risks facing consumers in the financial services market.

“The fall-out is still with us. Many people have waited years for a decision on compensation and, because of the way they have pursued their claims, even then they may not receive the full amount. Serious risks of further mis-selling remain.”

The PAC urged regulator the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Treasury to do more to find out how much mis-selling is still happening and identify which activities work best to prevent it.

It said departments and regulators have been “far too passive” in allowing compensation that could have gone to mis-selling victims instead going to claims managers.

More than 12 million consumers were mis-sold PPI and firms have paid over £22 billion in compensation to them since April 2011, the report said.

While it is “straightforward and free” for affected consumers to claim compensation, in 2014-15 80% of complaints to the Ombudsman about PPI were made through claims management companies.

The report said: “In many cases, these companies merely package up payment protection insurance claims, but they typically charge between a quarter and a third of any compensation subsequently paid …  the public bodies involved have been too slow in taking responsibility for this situation, and too passive in allowing it to happen.”

The committee said firms’ cultures and the nature of their sales incentives have been key factors behind mis-selling.

While the FCA has taken some action, “the risks of mis-selling remain, for example pensions freedoms reforms are a potential trigger for future mass mis-selling”, the report found.

The report said: “The FCA has withdrawn a planned review of banks’ culture, but has not articulated what culture it expects firms to have. There is no guarantee that any improvements in cultures will stick as the regulatory spotlight moves away.”

The committee has urged the FCA to outline what it needs to do to improve the cultures of financial services firms and to report back on how effective this has been in a year’s time.

It found a range of causes for products being mis-sold, from incompetent or intimidating sales teams to products that were badly-designed or unsuitable.

Middle managers in financial services firms were often promoted on the basis of sales targets, making it hard to keep the focus on consumers’ needs, the report found.

The FCA should also set out what more it will do to ensure firms check consumers’ understanding of the products they buy and their rights to claim compensation, the committee said.

The committee also raised concerns that many people are having to wait over two years for a decision on their compensation claims. It said the Ombudsman Service should set out a clear timetable for cutting and ultimately eliminating the backlog.

It said that while the Ombudsman has reduced the number of open PPI cases, it has a large backlog of older cases and 45% of open cases are more than a year old, while 17% (39,300) are more than two years old. In 2015-16 so far, half of PPI cases have taken 15 months or more to close.


READ MORE

PPI complaints deadline could spark increase in nuisance calls

MPs call for fraud probe into £75 million Scottish Power consumer row ‘bigger than PPI’