Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Would you buy it, wear it … then take it back?

(iStock)
(iStock)

DO you keep quiet if you’re under-charged in a restaurant? Or return used clothing to the shop?

New research suggests our morals around money may be changing.

The study found that “wardrobing” – whereby someone buys an item of clothing, wears it, then returns it to the retailer for a refund – may be becoming more acceptable.

One in three 18 to 29-year-olds surveyed would be prepared to buy, wear and return something bought online.

But only one in 10 people in their fifties believes doing this is acceptable, the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment (CISI) found.

The research suggests behaving unethically may be deemed more acceptable when it affects a company or large commercial entity, rather than a person.

While 17% of people surveyed would be willing to wear and return an item they had bought online, only 11% would do this at a local shop – where they would have to deal with a store assistant face-to-face.

The thought of brazening it out at the tills with a queue of tutting customers waiting behind may well put some people off trying their luck.

The survey also asked people how they would react if, following a meal, they noticed the waiter had left off a round of drinks bought at the bar beforehand when adding up the bill.

Two-fifths (39%) of people would be happy to say nothing.

Again, there were age variations, with 51% of 18 to 29-year-olds versus 35% of 50 to 59-year-olds finding this acceptable.

Simon Culhane, chief executive of the CISI, says: “This survey has demonstrated that ethical behaviour and motivation on a day-to-day basis can be affected by gender, age and money.”

He says technology is also a significant factor, as it has removed the need to interact face to face – which, he says, “could point to our becoming desensitised to the person behind the corporate entity, firm or online retailer”.