Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

David Wilson: Why turning true crime into entertainment brings out the worst in us and is deeply unhealthy for our society

Steven Avery’s case featured in Netflix’s Making A Murderer - True crime shows have become staples of the entertainment industry
Steven Avery’s case featured in Netflix’s Making A Murderer - True crime shows have become staples of the entertainment industry

IT’S a truism that all drama is all about conflict, and increasingly we are coming to realise that true crime stories are the perfect dramatic vehicles – not only offering conflict, but much more.

The news that the American lawyer David Rudolf, who defended the author Michael Peterson, a man convicted of murdering his wife Kathleen in 2003 in North Carolina, and who would ultimately accept an “Alford Plea” for that murder in 2017, is set to tour this country, is only the most recent reminder of this truism. Kathleen’s death gained infamy through the Netflix series The Staircase.

It’s also a reminder how true crime has become one of the staples of the entertainment industry.

After all, Rudolf’s tour comes hard on the heels of another country-wide tour of American lawyers who shot to fame through defending their client, and which became the backbone of another Netflix documentary.

Jerry Buting and Dean Strang doggedly defended Steven Avery – a man wrongly convicted of rape and then accused, and ultimately convicted of, a murder in Wisconsin, after his release from prison for the rape that he had never committed. The twists and turns of that story were eagerly followed by the millions of viewers of Making A Murderer, which premiered on Netflix in 2015.

I got to see first-hand the popularity of that series and the impact of true crime on viewers, as I acted as moderator on a number of the legs of the subsequent tour by Strang and Buting in 2017.

In many true crime series there is a context being offered of the “miscarriage of justice”, which may also have been appealing to the audience. But what about other true crime products which are simply using what criminologists call “the joys of transgression” – driving cars too fast, shooting guns, or taking bloody revenge – to seduce the audience to the screen, or the stage? The secret fascination that lets people slow down to watch the accident on the other side of the motorway, or the peculiar and enduring appeal that some people have for serial killers as individuals. As these obsessions healthy?

It’s a question which is worth asking now, especially in the wake of the announcement that Quentin Tarantino is to make a movie in 2019, called Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, about the murders committed by The Manson Family.

If we can make the deaths of nine people into a popular form of entertainment, can we simply dismiss this a pleasure like that we get riding a roller-coaster, when we are scared, but excited at the same time?

I don’t think so. A fascination with cruelty, torture, death and destruction is deeply unhealthy and, whilst we can find all sorts of clever ways to explain that fascination away, if it is not ultimately harnessed to something which is positive and optimistic about people as individuals, and society as a whole, merely to revel in a “gore fest”, whether it be imagined, or based on true events, is to play to the worst of human qualities, not the best.