Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

The Sunday Post View: Art school bosses risked more than a building. They risked our trust

© Robert Perry/Getty ImagesThe Mackintosh Building at the Glasgow School Of Art ablaze for the second time in four years on June 16, 2018
The Mackintosh Building at the Glasgow School Of Art ablaze for the second time in four years on June 16, 2018

The shock and sadness drifted like smoke from the west end of Sauchiehall Street around the world.

The world-famous Mackintosh building was all but destroyed, an icon of design and architecture gutted by flames and ruined by smoke and, in May 2014, it seemed the whole world shared Scotland’s pain.

As the board and management team of Glasgow School of Art promised to rebuild the ravaged building every Scot had their back. But that was then.

Today, we reveal how millions of pounds, £20 million at least, probably much more, carried to the art school on a torrent of goodwill was never needed to rebuild Charles Rennie Mackintosh’s masterpiece. That was covered by more than £50m of insurance money.

So what did the art school do? Did they go public, thank everyone for their support, say they wanted to use the donations to improve and expand the campus, ask if everyone was all right with that and, if not, offer to refund their money?

Well, no, they did not. Instead, they launched another fundraising appeal, to fully fund their expansion plans but, crucially and questionably, were still talking about the fire, still talking about rebuilding the Mackintosh building.

Smoke and mirrors: How Glasgow School of Art diverted Mackintosh fire millions to fund expansion – click here to read more

Now, there is much to like about Muriel Gray, but, as can happen, sometimes, in the wrong place at the wrong time, someone’s qualities can turn into terrible failings.

The chair of the GSA board is spikey, unwilling to suffer fools gladly, or at all, and more than willing and capable of fighting her corner. However, on occasion, say, for example, when she is giving evidence to a Holyrood committee, her passionate conviction can look a little like arrogance.

When your institution has just suffered a second devastating fire, four years after the first; when the rebuilding was funded (or so we thought) by millions of pounds of public donations and taxpayers’ subsidy; when that money has literally gone up in smoke, then it might be time to draw your horns in.

It might even be time for a note of contrition or a word of apology because these fires did not only devastate the art school. Neighbours were disrupted, traders hit and Glaswegians lost one of their city’s most popular concert venues as collateral damage; a venue, incidentally, that most of them knew better and enjoyed far more than the art school, which despite its majestic reputation, or perhaps because of it, never seemed to encourage visits from the hoi polloi.

It might, in fact, be time to hesitate before suggesting the stewardship of your board and management team has been exemplary and that rebuilding the school “is not up for discussion”.

Well, it’s up for discussion now or, more specifically, the future management of the GSA is up for discussion.

It is, frankly, not before time.