Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Alan Brazil: The ordinary punter is now priced out the game

(Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)
(Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

NOT many things are getting cheaper these days.

So English Premier League clubs should be applauded for freezing – or slashing – more than 80% of ticket prices this season.

Credit where it’s due. It’s a step in the right direction.

But when four out of five young adults still can’t afford to watch their teams on a regular basis, it’s clear that more needs to be done.

The top tier of English football is still too expensive for the average punter.

And, as far as I’m concerned, that’s a disgrace – because TV cash has made income from the gate near enough irrelevant.

It’s a different story in Scotland, where clubs aren’t handed fortunes by the likes of Sky and BT Sport.

Even at Celtic and Rangers, ticket sales make up a fair proportion of income.

Ask clubs like Aberdeen, Hibs and Dundee, and it’s even more important.

But for England’s top clubs, ticket income is a drop in the ocean.

When the club that finishes bottom of England’s top flight is raking in nearly £100m from broadcasters, slashing ticket prices for the average punter should be a no-brainer.

I’m not talking about hospitality-level prices – they are taken up by people who can afford to pay fortunes.

If a business wants to spend £50,000 every year for a box at the Emirates, then fair play – Arsenal should take the money.

But a standard seat behind the goal, where a father might take his kids, should be far more affordable.

The Gunners – whose individual match prices are notoriously high – currently charge non-members £65.50 for a seat in the front rows behind the goal for big games, with no concessions for youngsters.

Kids prices are available in the family section – but both adults and kids have to be members. That costs £15 for each child and £34 for the adult. Then big-game tickets cost £64 for adults and £24 for kids.

I’ve got three girls who weren’t into football, but if I’d had three boys, taking them to see Arsenal for a game could cost £79 in membership fees and £136 in ticket money.

To be fair to the Gunners, they have done good work on pricing their season tickets more attractively.

But, for ordinary working people, forking out upwards of £200 for an afternoon at the football is impossible – and they shouldn’t be expected to do it.

Every English Premier League club these days has players earning something in the region of £100,000 a week.

Ordinary punters – who might take four or five years to earn that much money – shouldn’t be expected to contribute as heavily as they are being asked to.

Young adults aged 18-24 – the group where four out of five say cost is a barrier to their attendance – need special attention, too.

Why? Because if you don’t get into the habit of going to the football when you’re young, you may never get into it at all.

Full stadiums are attractive, they are a part of what has made the English game such a sellable product over the years.

But unless clubs act to widen access, the few empty seats you see dotted around are going to turn into sweeping sections.

In the short term, clubs aren’t going to feel any difference, financially, which is exactly why they should lower prices.

Because in the long run, if people have to look for other ways to fill their time, tempting them back might just prove impossible.