Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

“The biggest stitch-up in history”: MSP accuses health board of rigging consultation on site of new hospital

Alex Neil has accused NHS Lanarkshire of rigging consultation into possible sites for a new Monklands hospital
Alex Neil has accused NHS Lanarkshire of rigging consultation into possible sites for a new Monklands hospital

AN MSP has accused a health board of “the biggest stitch-up in history” before the site of a new £600 million hospital is chosen.

Alex Neil says NHS Lanarkshire’s public consultation over where to site the replacement for Monklands Hospital was rigged in favour of a site at Gartcosh, near Coatbridge.

He and MP Neil Grey believe an appraisal process to decide between Gartcosh, another site at Glenmavis or remaining at Monklands – was filled with health authority staff to produce the desired result.

They say almost two thirds of the “stakeholders” whose views were sought work for either the health board, the Scottish Ambulance Service or other related groups.

They claim just one patient who took part in the controversial scoring process lived in the catchment area.

Meanwhile, fruit and veg magnate Ronnie Bartlett, who offered the Glenmavis site for free, has accused the health board of “tarnishing” his land in its report by overestimating clean-up costs.

Former Health Secretary Alex Neil said: “It’s clear the health board had already made their mind up that they want the new hospital at Gartcosh. I wouldn’t be surprised if they even suggested to staff how to vote because this whole process has been a stitch-up from beginning to end – the biggest stitch-up in history.”

Mr Neil claims the health board tried to scupper the Glenmavis site by over-inflating the costs of groundwork. He said: “NHS Lanarkshire pulled every stunt imaginable.”

The pair also accuse the health board of slashing travel times to Gartcosh to make it appear more accessible; ignoring a planned £190 million road which would make Glenmavis easier to get to, and underestimating the cost of a culvert at Gartcosh.

Thirteen public consultation meetings have taken place in recent months. A “core” group of 53 people was set up to assess potential sites, and whittled the list down to the three sites. Mr Neil and Mr Gray say 27 were health management or staff. Four were members of the project team.

Mr Gray called for an inquiry into the consultation, adding: “The 53 people who were asked to ‘score’ were hand- picked by NHS Lanarkshire. Our concern is that so many of them are health ‘experts’, not ordinary patients from the hospital catchment area.”

‘My land has been tarnished by an NHS report from individuals who have never set foot on the site’- Ronnie Bartlett

Mr Bartlett, chairman of Glenmavis-based vegetable company Albert Bartlett, challenged the findings of the health board’s report into the cost of preparing his land for construction work.

He commissioned his own report then told the health board to remove their claims, describing them as “potentially damaging to future projects”.

He said: “I was happy to offer my land to the NHS as the public in this area have had a local hospital for more than 40 years and I would like to see that continue. I have stayed out of the public debate despite my misgivings about the decision-making process by the NHS.

“But I am not prepared to have my land tarnished by an NHS-commissioned report from individuals who have never set foot on the site.

“I have provided the NHS with a report from leading consultants who have actually surveyed the land.

“This reports paints a very different picture to what the NHS and their advisers assert and I have asked them to include this factual report in their consultation process.

“Despite this, my offer of land remains and I am prepared to work with the NHS to deliver a world-class hospital for the Monklands public.”

NHS Lanarkshire rejected the politicians’ claims that the consultation had been unfairly biased towards Gartcosh.

Colin Lauder, director of planning , property and performance, said the process had met all Scottish Government guidelines and added the assessment of journey times and transport links to the sites were accurate and stood by the consultants’ estimated land clean-up costs.

He added: “Our only interest is to find the best possible site for the future University Hospital Monklands.”

Mr Neil said the board’s response was misleading and inaccurate, adding: “As a former Cabinet Secretary for Health I am appalled at their behaviour.”