Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Experts warn of needless trauma for too many vulnerable youngsters as its revealed police strip searched 800 youngsters in one year

(Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

POLICE have strip searched children in custody almost 800 times in the last year.

But only 35 of the searches – four per cent – found drugs or weapons.

Experts have called for an urgent review of the practice which saw officers order children to remove all or some of their clothes 791 times in the 12 months to July.

In the same period, three under-18s had full-body searches under medical supervision and another 6,000 standard searches were carried out on children as young as nine.

Claire Lightowler, director of the Scottish Centre for Youth and Criminal Justice, said the number of negative searches suggested too many were being carried out and risked traumatising children.

She said: “The fact that 96% of strip searches and 100% of intimate searches of children did not find anything of concern reveals that the practice should be urgently reviewed.

“Children are in a vulnerable and often distressed state following arrest and searching them inevitably exacerbates this. Removing any child’s clothes and visually examining their bodies will be traumatic but potentially even more traumatic for children who more regularly come into contact with the police. They tend to be our most vulnerable and victimised children.”

Concern at the number of young people being searched was echoed by Angela Morgan, a social work expert and former head of children’s charity Includem.

She said it should not have taken a freedom of information request to obtain the information, and it should be published routinely by the force, adding: “As well as the fundamental expectation that public bodies are open and accountable, I would expect Police Scotland to recognise the significance of searching on vulnerable young people and be keen to seek independent support and expertise on child protection. Unfortunately, the current position leaves it unclear how Police Scotland looks at how the training and policy around searching translates into the real experience of children.”

Ms Morgan suggested the searches should be made a regular discussion point for the Scottish Police Authority.

The figures come after the national force’s stop and search policy was changed in 2016 after sustained criticism. Officers were found to be over-using “consensual” stop and search powers on under 18-year-olds after it emerged that in 2013/14, officers carried out 640,699 searches.

The technique was described by the UN Human Rights Committee as “allegedly unlawful and disproportionate” with critics arguing they were too young to understand that they did not have to consent.

In 2016, Police Scotland stopped carrying out consensual searches on children and adults, with Scottish ministers deciding they could no longer search under 18s for alcohol either.

Data on the number, type, frequency and findings of stop and search procedures is now routinely recorded by the force, which experts suggest should be extended to cover searches of children who are arrested.

Between June 2017 and June 2018, 57 children were strip searched under stop and search powers, with items found including knives, drugs and cigarette papers.

Of the 57 searches, 30 were negative and 27 uncovered contraband.

Superintendent Gregor Fitzcharles, of Police Scotland’s Criminal Justice Service Division, said: “A strip search is carried out in custody where there is a suggestion a person may be concealing controlled drugs or other potentially harmful articles.

“The main basis for undertaking a strip search is for the primary care and welfare of that person to ensure they don’t come to harm, as well as considerations for staff safety.

“This type of search is normally carried out when there is intelligence suggesting a threat or when a person is unwilling to engage with our vulnerability assessment questions.”

However, Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokesperson Liam McArthur MSP questioned the quality of the intelligence being used by police to justify strip searches if 96% failed to find anything.

He said: “With these figures showing that hundreds of children are subject to strip searches, I think it is clear that we need to see a more thorough review of this practice.

“This would be a sensible step towards reassuring people that the use of strip searches is appropriate and proportionate.”