Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

The Sunday Post View: People want a tax regime that has common sense

Post Thumbnail

IN our poll on Scottish taxes, it’s clear what people think.

They are clear that services need to be improved, they are clear on the services that they want improved, and they are clear on the fact that they are prepared to pay more in tax for those improvements.

However, they are also clear on the fact they want a comprehensive spending review completed before these rises take place.

And they are talking common sense.

People are extremely aware of the fact that we live in a world with new and complex challenges, challenges much different to those in the past when the existing tax regime would have been developed.

We have a growing elderly population, with many of those people living with chronic health conditions that need expensive and lengthy treatments.

We have children with a variety of needs – often requiring specialist help – being taught in mainstream schools, and we have a transport network that needs to be modernised to cope with the challenges of the growing problem of pollution.

A taxing decision: Survey reveals voters want spending review before tax hikes

Folk understand this and, by looking at the results of our poll, understand that this has to be paid for.

However, what they won’t accept is for their tax payments to be mismanaged once they fall into the public purse.

There needs to be a far stronger financial stewardship of public money. Just look at two recent cases.

A former senior officer at Police Scotland had her tax bill paid for her and was allowed to claim thousands upon thousands in relocation costs.

In another case a civilian was paid £200,000 for only nine months’ work.

Is this how public money should be handled?

No – and those who head up our public services must be more robust in how that money is spent.

Otherwise we may well raise millions more in tax, but still find that those who need it most aren’t seeing the full benefit.