Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Judy Murray: Why do all these part-time MPs think £80,000 salaries are not enough? They think rules are for other, little, people

© Andrew CawleyJudy Murray (Andrew Cawley/DC Thomson)
Judy Murray

The slogan has become a familiar refrain for Boris Johnson and his ministers who have promised to “build back better” again and again.

Well, here’s hoping but, in the meantime, they should build back decency. After the events of last week, a more accurate slogan for this government would be “For us, not them”.

We are mired, again, in a Westminster sleaze scandal which has, over the last few days, moved quickly from the Prime Minister trying to halt the suspension of one of his backbenchers for abusing his position to a debate about MPs having second jobs.

Owen Paterson lobbied ministers and officials on behalf of two firms without mentioning they were paying him £9,000 a month. It would be difficult to find a more clear-cut case of questionable conduct but the prime minister still felt suspending Paterson as recommended by an all-party group of MPs was harsh.

The ensuing furore prompted a hasty U-turn but still too late. Paterson resigned from his seat insisting he was innocent while voters were again looking at Westminster and its politicians with weary cynicism. How many times have we been here before?

Coincidentally, just when Number 10 needed a diversion, the papers got wind of another scandal, with Geoffrey Cox MP revealed to have earned £900,000 as a QC last year while purportedly representing voters in Devon and so the story became all about MPs and their second jobs and not Number 10’s judgment.

Although parliamentary rules state that MPs can have a second job (as long as they are not a minister) it has emerged more than 200 MPs, like Paterson and Cox, have received earnings in the last year on top of their £81,932 annual salary. So, the question is: should our politicians take a full-time salary while representing their constituents part-time? After all, that is, essentially, what they are doing by taking on additional employment.

Being an MP shouldn’t be a part-time jolly, nor should it be a way for rich people to make themselves even richer. If you are elected to represent constituents in parliament, all your effort and attention should be dedicated to giving the public fair and equal representation. If you are spending half your week at another lucrative “consulting job”, you cannot possibly be putting your constituency first.

In response, some commentators have said MPs should be banned from having a second job, but their salary should also be increased by way of compensation. Only 5% of the UK population earn upwards of £82,000 a year, so why do these politicians believe they deserve to be paid more than 95% of ordinary working people?

Well, because too many believe they are above the rules. Just look at Boris Johnson last week, walking around a hospital without a face covering, while surrounded by masked staff and telling the public we all need to work together to end the pandemic.

If you take on a role like that of an MP, you should do it because you want to stand up for the public, and do everything in your power to make the country a better place. Standing for office can never be about using elected office as a stepping-stone to wealth and influence.

To the MPs who think they need a second income, I would suggest: get on and do the job you were elected to do.

If you do not think the role should be your main focus, go and work for a big firm and leave the politics to people who actually possess the care and commitment to do it right.