Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Mandy Rhodes: Jo Swinson’s claims to be potential PM are just more fake news

© Aaron Chown/PA WireLiberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson
Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson

In the same week the leader of the Liberal Democrats was forced to deny a fake news report that she fired stones at squirrels while calling them “pleb bunnies”, she also revealed an unequivocal willingness to fire nuclear weapons.

And Jo Swinson is meant to be the reasonable candidate, a self-styled candidate to be Prime Minister.

She is instead fast becoming the Marmite candidate of this election campaign.

Having been barred from the first televised leaders’ debate on the grounds, she then managed to make headlines following a post-match interview when she gave an affirmative, one-word answer when asked if she would press the big red nuke button while at the same time insisting she would not leave our children a “boiling planet”.

Setting aside the state of the world after a nuclear fall-out, the Lib Dems have pinned their hopes in this general election on two things: the popular appeal of Swinson and the simple message that she will revoke Article 50.

On both counts, they have miscalculaed and that is now being reflected in the polls.

When Swinson took over as leader in July, she was, despite her years as a junior minister in the Tory-led, austerity-delivering, Lib-Dem coalition, a relative unknown. Indeed, in the leadership contest, she was presented as the “next generation politician”. A fresh face. A new start. Four months in and the more the public get to see of her, the less keen they are.

Women appear to have a particular aversion, with some suggesting she is a little school prefect-like while others, more seriously, suspect she is an extremist and a fake. Her claims that the Lib Dems would revoke Article 50 have cast her as undemocratic.

This is a time for the Lib Dems to be the moderates, to build consensus, and to tell the truth, and while Swinson continues to peddle a future she cannot deliver, she will always be seen as fake.

And that is evident when even her most candid admission that she smoked cannabis at university and enjoyed it, simply sounds like something she would make up to impress, because few actually believe it to be true.

And there’s the serious point. Trust has become a real issue in this election and the renaming of the Conservative party’s press office Twitter account as “factcheckUK” – presenting itself as a credible fact-checking service while it pumped out party propaganda – for the duration of the TV debate is simply symptomatic of how lies have become normalised.

This is a seismic election. A battle for two futures – aside from viewers in Scotland – and it is a contest pitched between two unpopular men offering two visions for the country that the public already suspect are based on falsehoods.

The question for the voters in Scotland is not so much who you trust to be your next prime minister – because we will get who we are given – but who it is you trust to get Scotland’s voice heard by whatever man is in No 10. And that’s no lie.