Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Liverpool overpaid for Virgil Van Dijk out of desperation, says Alan Shearer

Virgil van Dijk (PA)
Virgil van Dijk (PA)

ALAN SHEARER claims Liverpool paid over the odds to land Virgil van Dijk as they made him the most expensive defender in the game.

A £75million deal to take the Dutchman from Southampton to Anfield was agreed on Wednesday, ahead of the transfer window opening on January 1.

That is when Liverpool will welcome Van Dijk formally into their ranks, and former England captain Shearer, who played for Saints early in his career, is convinced the Reds only agreed to the world-record fee out of desperation.

He told BBC Radio 5 live: “Southampton have got one hell of a deal. Van Dijk is a good player, yes, but for £75million? No, he’s not worth it at all.

“Southampton could have named any price they wanted. They knew Liverpool were absolutely desperate for a centre-half. Everyone is aware they are desperate – we have seen them come up short several times this season.

“When Liverpool try and sign a goalkeeper – which they also desperately need – they will find the same thing.

“We’ve been saying it for a number of years now – that transfer fees have gone through the roof – and this one has taken it to another level.”

Shearer’s former England team-mate Gary Neville was also taken aback by the price tag for the 26-year-old centre-back, who joined Southampton from Celtic for around £13million less than two and a half years ago.

Neville told Sky Sports: “It’s a lot of money, isn’t it? I’ve not seen a lot of Southampton recently but I’m not sure he’s even been playing that well.

“I know Liverpool have wanted him for obviously six months and they do need back-up. He’s a good defender and if they can get him back to his best… well they’ll need to won’t they for £75million?

“It’s the way the market’s shifted to an incredible level that’s shocked me. I’m not surprised by the actual transfer, but that is an incredible amount of money.”